Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Enter legal issue and location

Brendan P. Glackin - San Francisco, CA

Embarcadero Center West275 Battery Street29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111

Super Lawyers®

1

Updated: 01/30/2016

San Francisco Antitrust & Intellectual Property Lawyer

Overview

Promoting Fair Competition in Technology Markets

A dedicated antitrust and securities fraud litigator, Brendan P. Glackin possesses a wealth of litigation and trial experience.

Brendan's successful cases at Lieff Cabraser include, most recently, the High-Tech Employees class action alleging that major Silicon Valley firms colluded to reduce competition for workers. Brendan successfully argued for certification of a class of over 64,000 employees of seven different companies; after vigorous litigation the High-Tech team recovered a total of $435 million, the largest recovery ever in an employee class action against private employers.

In 2013, Brendan represented direct purchasers of titanium dioxide in a nationwide antitrust class action lawsuit. The complaint alleged that defendants coordinated increases in the prices for titanium dioxide despite declining demand, decreasing raw material costs, and industry overcapacity. After litigating the case to within days of trial, the class reached a series of settlements totaling $163.5 million.

Brendan also played a significant role in litigation against a cartel of the world's leading liquid crystal display (LCD) manufacturers. Over the course of the litigation, the direct purchaser class reached settlements with all defendants except Toshiba. The case against Toshiba proceeded to trial. Brendan, working under Co-Lead Counsel Richard Heimann, put on all expert testimony for the plaintiffs, examined numerous other witnesses, and argued motions in limine and jury instructions. In July 2012, the jury found Toshiba liable. The case was subsequently settled, bringing the total direct purchaser settlements in the LCDs antitrust litigation to over $470 million.

In 2011, Brendan was one of the trial counsel for distributors and retailers in an antitrust class action against Abbott Laboratories charging that the company quintupled the price of Norvir, a crucial AIDS "booster" drug, in order to force patients to reject superior competing drugs in favor of Abbott's combination therapy, Kaletra. After opening statements and the presentation of four witnesses and evidence to the jury, plaintiffs and Abbott Laboratories entered into a $52 million settlement.

Brendan presently serves on the Lieff Cabraser team representing The Charles Schwab Corporation in a suit against the world's major banks for allegedly manipulating the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), which is used as a global reference rate by financial institutions. Glackin also serves on the Lieff Cabraser team representing the indirect purchaser class in the lithium-ion batteries price-fixing case.

Brendan is a frequent speaker on antitrust law and complex class actions. He also teaches trial advocacy through the National Institute for Trial Advocacy (NITA). As a Deputy Public Defender in Contra Costa County, Brendan took more than twenty felony and misdemeanor cases to trial.

About Brendan P. Glackin

Current Employment Position(s)

  • Partner

Practice Areas

  • Antitrust & Intellectual Property
  • Securities & Investor Fraud

Qualifications

Bar Admissions

  • California, 1998
  • New York, 2000
  • U.S. Court of Appeals 2nd Circuit, 2013
  • U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit, 2004
  • U.S. District Court Central District of California, 2001
  • U.S. District Court Eastern District of California, 2001
  • U.S. District Court Northern District of California, 2001
  • U.S. District Court Southern District of California, 2001
  • U.S. District Court District of Colorado, 2001
  • U.S. District Court Southern District of New York, 2001

Other Affiliations

  • Bar Association of San Francisco Antitrust Section (Executive Committee )
  • State Bar of California

Classes and Seminars

  • Antitrust Trials: The View From the Trenches, 2013
  • Applying Settlements Offsets to Antiftust Judgments, ABA Spring Meetings, 2013
  • California Trial Advocacy, PLI, 2013
  • Building Trial Skills, NITA, 2013
  • Antitrust Institute 2011: Develpoments & Hot Topics, - 2011
  • Ramifications of American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League, - 2010

Past Positions

  • Contra Costa Public Defender, 2005 - 2007
  • Boies, Schiller & Flexner, 2000 - 2005
  • Willkie Farr & Gallagher, 1999 - 2000
  • Honorable William B. Shubb, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California, Law Clerk, 1998 - 1999

Education

  • Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1998
    J.D.
    Honors: cum laude
  • University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 1995
    A.B.

Office Information

Address

Embarcadero Center West275 Battery Street29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111

Fax

  • (415) 956-1008

Achievements

Other Sources of Feedback About Brendan P. Glackin

Included on the 2025 Northern California Super Lawyers list


Past Lists

  • 2024 Northern California Super Lawyers list
  • 2023 Northern California Super Lawyers list
  • 2022 Northern California Super Lawyers list
  • 2021 Northern California Super Lawyers list
  • 2020 Northern California Super Lawyers list
  • 2019 Northern California Super Lawyers list
  • 2018 Northern California Super Lawyers list
  • 2017 Northern California Super Lawyers list
  • 2016 Northern California Super Lawyers list
  • 2015 Northern California Super Lawyers list
  • 2014 Northern California Super Lawyers list
  • 2013 Northern California Super Lawyers list

View the profile for Brendan P. Glackin on Super Lawyers

Honors

  • "Super Lawyer for Northern California," Super Lawyers, 2013 - 2014

When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.

Write Your Review

Fields marked with an * are required

1. Rating

Overall rating

How would you rate your overall experience with this lawyer?

Use the up and down arrows to increase or decrease the rating

Please Rate
Optional ratings
Value
Please Rate
Quality Of Service
Please Rate
Professional Competence
Please Rate

2. Review

Please share your opinion of working with this attorney. Do not reveal personal information or details about your case. All submitted reviews are shared with the attorney prior to publishing.

Your feedback must be at least 50 characters.Your review must be at least 50 characters
I would recommend this attorney to friends and family:

3. Verification

Keep my name anonymous from public view:
Customer Type
Please choose one

Unable to send request

By submitting this form you agree to receive email communications from FindLaw related to the management of your review.

Privacy Statement Contact Lawyer FAQ

Map Location

Google Map

How do I choose a lawyer?

Consider the following:

Comfort Level
- Are you comfortable telling the lawyer personal information? Does the lawyer seem interested in solving your problem?

Credentials
- How long has the lawyer been in practice? Has the lawyer worked on other cases similar to yours?

Cost
- How are the lawyer's fees structured - hourly or flat fee? Can the lawyer estimate the cost of your case?

City
- Is the lawyer's office conveniently located?

Not sure what questions to ask a lawyer?

Here are a few to get you started:

  • How long have you been in practice?
  • How many cases like mine have you handled?
  • How often do you settle cases out of court?
  • What are your fees and costs?
  • What are the next steps?

Want to check lawyer discipline?

It is always a good idea to research your lawyer prior to hiring. Every state has a disciplinary organization that monitors attorneys, their licenses, and consumer complaints. By researching lawyer discipline you can:

  • Ensure the attorney is currently licensed to practice in your state
  • Gain an understanding of his or her historical disciplinary record, if any.
  • Determine the seriousness of complaints/issues which could range from late bar fees to more serious issues requiring disciplinary action.

Find a Lawyer

More Options