Prettyman Law - Eagan, MN

I’ve unfortunately have had to use Anna’s help twice for custody hearings. But I wouldn’t choose anyone else. She’s smart, professional, and dedicated. Having her in my corner puts my mind at ease when the stress of conflicts arise.

Anna was extremely honest and compassionate when I was working with her. She was very responsive to my needs and I was very pleased on how many times made me feel like my voice mattered. Anna is very professional.

From the very first consultation to the end Anna showed complete care, professionalism and always had my best interest in mind. She showed me the importance of being fair which can be a hard thing when going through tough stuff. 10 out of 10 would recommend her to anyone looking for excellent legal representation.

Anna was a fantastic divorce lawyer from the beginning to the end of my case. She communicated realistic expectations to me in regards to my case. She also was prompt in getting me answers for questions when I had them. I recommend Anna to anyone who is looking for professional representation as well as someone who has a great understanding of Minnesota law. Thanks Anna!

On March 8, 2023, my ex-husband physically assaulted me. The following morning, after contacting the police again for assistance, I relocated with my young daughters to my mother’s residence in Iowa, as I had no safe place to stay in Minnesota. I hired Anna to represent me in my divorce proceedings, paying her over $30,000 for her services. However, Anna was reluctant to go to trial and failed to advocate for my best interests during mediation with my aggressive ex-husband, urging me to settle for his demands. I agreed to return to Minnesota by September 2024 to share 50/50 custody with my ex-husband, contingent upon him paying the property equalizer as part of the divorce settlement. Anna was supposed to draft and submit the divorce decree by May 23, 2024. Although she agreed to this in front of Judge Edwards on April 24, 2024, she did not follow through. I repeatedly contacted her throughout June and July, and finally received a draft on June 17, which I promptly reviewed and returned with notes. Despite further follow-ups, Anna delayed incorporating my and the opposing counsel’s notes until August 19. Due to Anna’s lack of responsiveness, the divorce decree was not finalized, preventing me from moving back to Minnesota as planned. My ex-husband refused to exchange custody of our daughters on September 1, leading to an emergency hearing where the judge allowed him to keep the children in Minnesota. This decision followed a private meeting between Anna, the opposing counsel, and Judge Edwards, during which I was not informed of the discussions. Anna claimed she informed the judge of my ex-husband’s abusive behavior, but the judge was indifferent. Instead of paying the divorce settlement as stipulated, my ex-husband transferred securities to avoid tax liabilities. Anna sent one email to the opposing counsel to address this issue but has not followed up since. This situation has left me without the necessary funds to relocate, impacti ng my ability to be with my children. Anna’s conduct has been egregious, showing a disregard for my and my daughters’ well-being. Anna attributed the delay in finalizing the divorce decree to extensive back-and-forth with the opposing counsel. When I requested all email correspondence and an itemized bill for her services, she refused.