Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik - Employment Lawyers - San Diego, CA
2255 Calle ClaraSan Diego, CA 92037- 3107
Updated: 03/20/2020
Your Profile? Update Now
San Diego Employment Law Firm
Overview
San Diego employment lawyers focusing on labor laws.About Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik - Employment Lawyers
Practice Areas
- Employment Law
- Wage and Hour
Litigation
- 100%
Previous Law Firm Name
- Blumenthal & Markham
Pro Bono Activities
- La Jolla Friends of Seals v. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admin. Nat. Marine Fisheries Service S.D.Cal. Environmental 06/29/2009 2009 WL 1862424
People
Attorneys
- Norman B. Blumenthal (Managing Partner)
Staff
- Jonathan Zacharias, Law Clerk, (858) 551-1223
- Chrystal Johnson, Head of Administration, (858) 551-1223
Office Information
Address
2255 Calle ClaraSan Diego, CA 92037- 3107
Phone
Fax
- 858-551-1232
Offers Free Initial Consultation
Yes
Accepts Credit Cards
Yes
Office Hours
We offer FREE CONSULTATIONS whenever we are available. We pride ourselves in responding rapidly.
Other Offices
Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik, Employment Law Attorneys1750 Montgomery Street1st FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111415-935-3957
Employment Law Attorneys in California, Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik5201 Great America Pkwy. Suite 320San Jose, CA 95054408-681-8477
Video & Photo
Photo
Published
Articles
-
Overtime Wage Claims
For information about our approach to unfair pay practices anywhere in the state, contact our firm. We represent workers in individual and class action lawsuits on a contingency basis. -
Illegal Wage & Hour Practice
Our experience with litigation over unfair compensation issues can help ensure that we identify all of the available claims for back pay that apply to an employee's situation, not just the most obvious ones. -
Wrongful Termination Discrimination & Harassment
Our lawyers investigate and litigate claims of discrimination on the job, sexual harassment, employer retaliation and wrongful termination. We advise workers throughout the state of California. -
Employee Benefits & Rights
Our experience with the identification and pursuit of workplace rights claims can help you recover compensation on an individual basis or as a member of a defined plaintiff class. -
Employee Class Action Advantages
With a statewide class action practice and offices in San Diego, San Francisco and San Jose, our class action attorneys are known throughout the state of California for representing workers in class action lawsuits against big companies.
Representative Cases
- Unpaid Wages and ERISA Claims, Barcia v. Contain-A-Way, Inc., Federal District Court, Southern District of California, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17118 (Southern District of California 2009)
- California Wage & Hour Class Action Claims
- California Overtime Laws, Southern District of California, No. 09cv02743 (2010)
- California Employment Laws, Southern District of California, 2008 WL 4791833 (Southern District of California 2010)
- California Overtime Attorneys, Louie v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., Southern District of California, 2008 WL 4473183 (Southern District of California 2009)
- IS/IT Professionals, Overtime Wages, Southern District of California, Louie v. Kaiser Medical, 2008 WL 2227531 (Southern District of California 2008)
- Salary laws, Southern District of California, 2008 WL 906045 (Southern District of California 2008)
- Unpaid Overtime, 3:09-CV-00168 (Southern District of California)
- Unpaid Commissions , (2010)
- Work Expenses, California Labor Code 2802, Larue v. Loomis Armored US, LLC (Southern District 2010)
- Security Guards, Wage Violations, Dirienzo v. Dunbar Armored, Inc., S.D. Cal. No. 09cv2745 (Southern District of California 2010)
- Computer Employees, Overtime Wages and Unpaid Expenses, Los Angeles Superior Court, Cabral v. Creative Communication Technologies, LA Sup. Ct. No. BC402239 (Los Angeles Superior Court)
- Vacation Time, Southern District of California, Henshaw et al v. Home Depot USA, Inc (Southern District of California 2010)
- Loss Prevention, Wage Violations, Orange County Superior Court, Aquino vs. Macy's, http://www.bamlawca.com (Superior Court of California, In and For the County of Orange 2010)
- Wage Deductions, Alameda County Superior Court, RG10529383 (Alameda County 2010)
- California Salary Employees, Southern District of California, MATHIES v. UNION BANK (Southern District of California 2010)
- In Re Bank of America Wage and Hour Employment Litigation, 2010 WL 4180530 (D.Kan. 2010)
- Kennedy v. Natural Balance Pet Foods, Inc., 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 248 (9th Cir. 2010)
- In Re Bank of America Wage and Hour Employment Litigation, 2010 WL 3833034 (D.Kan. 2010)
- Keshishzadeh v. Gallagher, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46805 (S.D. Cal. 2010)
- Steroid Hormone Product Cases, 181 Cal. App. 4th 145 (2010)
- Weltman v. Ortho Mattress, Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20521 (S.D. Cal. 2010)
- Weston v. FedEx Office & Print Servs., 707 F. Supp. 2d 1074 (S.D. Cal. 2010)
- Sussex v. Turnberry/MGM Grand Towers, LLC, 2010 WL 3171121 (D. Nev. 2010)
- Reynolds v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 332 Fed.Appx. 397 (2009)
- Owen v. Macy's, Inc., 175 Cal. App. 4th 462 (2009)
- Sussex v. Turnberry/MGM Grand Towers, LLC, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29503 (D. Nev. 2009)
- Picus v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 256 F.R.D. 651 (D. Nev. 2009)
- Tull v. Stewart Title of Cal., Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14171 (S.D. Cal. 2009)
- YOSHI v. FEDEX, 2009 U.S. Dist. Ct. Pleadings 812138 (S.D. Cal. 2009)
- La Jolla Friends of the Seals v. Nat'l Oceanic & Atmospheric Admin., 630 F. Supp. 2d 1222 (S.D. Cal. 2009)
- In re Pet Food Prods. Liab. Litig., MDL Docket No. 1850 (All Cases), 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94603 (D.N.J. 2008)
- Silvas v. E*Trade Mortg. Corp., 514 F.3d 1001 (9th Cir. 2008)
- REYNOLDS v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., 2008 U.S. 9th Cir. Briefs 55114 (9th Cir. 2008)
- Bova v. Washington Mut. Bank, 2008 WL 4791833 (S.D. Cal 2008)
- Delmare v. Sungard Higher Educ., Inc., 2008 WL 2227531 (S.D.Cal. 2008)
- Gruender v. First American Title Co., 2008 WL 2936823 (Cal. Superior 2008)
- La Jolla Friends of the Seals v. Nat'l Oceanic & Atmospheric Admin. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102380 (S.D. Cal. 2008)
- Puentes v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., 160 Cal. App. 4th 638 (2008)
- Schiff Food Products Co. v. Perez, 2007 WL 4510156 (Cal.App. 4 Dist. 2007)
- In re Tobacco Cases II, 41 Cal. 4th 1257 (2007)
- PCO, Inc. v. Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro, LLP, 150 Cal. App. 4th 384 (2007)
- Hall v. County of Los Angeles, 148 Cal. App. 4th 318 (2007)
- Rocker v. KPMG LLP, 122 Nev. 1185 (2006)
- Silvas v. E*Trade Mortg. Corp., 421 F. Supp. 2d 1315 (S.D. Cal. 2006)
- Meco v. Novaspes, Inc., 2006 WL 93245 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. 2006)
- Connel vs. Sun Microsystems, Inc., 2006 WL 4088315 (2006)
- Curry v. CTB McGraw-Hill, LLC, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5920; 97 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) (1988)
- 37 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA), 2390 (N.D. Cal. 2006)
- Coshow v. City of Escondido, 132 Cal. App. 4th 687 (2005)
- In re Tobacco Cases II, 20 Cal.Rptr.3d 693 (Cal.App. 4 Dist. 2004)
- Taiheiyo Cement Corp. v. Superior Court, 117 Cal. App. 4th 380 (2004)
- Rezec v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc., 116 Cal. App. 4th 135 (2004)
- Briseno v. American Sav. Bank, 2004 WL 5561659 (Cal.Superior 2004)
- Taiheiyo Cement Corp. v. Superior Court, 105 Cal.App. 4th 398 (2003)
- Gibson v. World Savings & Loan Asso., 103 Cal. App. 4th 1291 (2003)
- Delaney v. Warner-Lambert Co., 2003 WL 1548691 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. 2003)
- Olszewski v. Scripps Health, 30 Cal. 4th 798 (2003)
- In re Vesta Ins. Group Securities Litigation, 2002 WL 34248002 (N.D. Ala. 2002)
- Gibson v. World Savings & Loan Assn., 128 Cal.Rptr.2d 19 (Cal. App. 4th 2002)
- McMeans v. Scripps Health, Inc., 100 Cal. App. 4th 507 (2002)
- Jordan v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 100 Cal. App. 4th 431 (2002)
- Badillo v. Am. Tobacco Co., 202 F.R.D. 261 (D. Nev. 2001)
- Washington Mutual Bank v. Superior Court, 24 Cal. 4th 906 (2001)
- Ramos v. Countrywide Home Loans, 82 Cal.App. 4th 615 (2000)
- Tevssier v. City of San Diego, 81 Cal.App. 4th 685 (2000)
- Washington Mutual Bank v. Superior Court, 70 Cal. App. 4th 299 (1999)
- Jordan v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 75 Cal. App. 4th 445 (1999)
- Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. Superior Court, 72 Cal.App.4th 214 (1999)
- Kensington Capital Mgal. v. Oakley, Inc., 1999 U.S. Dist LEXIS 385; Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P90, 411 (C.D. Cal. 1999)
- Lister v. Oakley, Inc., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 384; Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P90, 409 (C.D Cal. 1999)
- Hildago v. Diversified Transp. Sya, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 3207 (9th Cir. 1998)
- McPhail v. First Command Fin. Planning, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26544 (S.D. Cal. 2009)
- Barcia v. Contain-A-Way, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17118 (S.D. Cal. 2009)
- Wise v. Cubic Def. Applications, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11225 (S.D. Cal. 2009)
- Gabisan v. Pelican Prods., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1391 (S.D. Cal. 2009)
- McPhail v. First Command Fin. Planning, Inc., 251 F.R.D. 514 (S.D. Cal. 2008)
- Barcia v. Contain-A-Way, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27365 (S.D. Cal. 2008)
- Louie v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78314 (S.D. Cal. 2008)
- Weltman v. Ortho Mattress, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60344 (S.D. Cal. 2008)
- Kennedy v. Natural Balance Pet Foods, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38889 (S.D. Cal. 2008)
- McPhail v. First Command Fin. Planning, Inc., 247 F.R.D. 598 (S.D. Cal. 2007)
- Kennedy v. Natural Balance Pet Foods, Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57766 (S.D. Cal. 2007)
- Reynov v. ADP Claims Servs. Group, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94332 (N.D. Cal. 2006)
- Daniels v. Philip Morris, 18 F.Supp 2d 1110, 1998 WL 564708 (S.D. Cal. 1998)
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our West Legal Directory disclaimers. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.
Call us at 858-551-1223
DISCLAIMER: If you send a lawyer or law firm email through this service, your email will not create an attorney-client relationship and will not necessarily be treated as privileged or confidential. You should not send sensitive or confidential information via this email service. The lawyer or law firm to whom you are writing may not choose to accept you as a client. Moreover, as the Internet is not necessarily a secure environment it is possible that your email sent via the Internet might be intercepted and read by third parties.
Firm Address
Phone:
Fax:
858-551-1232
2255 Calle ClaraSan Diego, CA 92037- 3107