Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Enter legal issue and location

Jeffrey W. Kobrick - San Mateo, CA

177 Bovet RoadSuite 600 San Mateo, CA 94402

Updated: 01/29/2013

San Mateo Complex Civil Litigation Lawyer

Overview

Since March 2004, Jeff Kobrick has been a partner in the Silicon Valley law firm Cooke Kobrick & Wu LLP. Jeff’s practice focuses on complex civil litigation in state and federal courts, securities litigation, SEC investigations and enforcement matters, contract disputes, business litigation of all kinds, theft of trade secrets, unfair competition, intellectual property, employment, and appeals. Before forming CKW, he was Senior Trial Counsel for nearly five years with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in Boston and San Francisco. He was lead trial counsel for the SEC in enforcement actions in United States District Courts involving a wide range of securities law issues, including insider trading, securities fraud in the offer and sale of securities, financial and accounting fraud by public companies, and broker dealer violations.

Before he joined the SEC, Mr. Kobrick was a litigator at Bingham Dana LLP (now Bingham McCutchen LLP) and at Gaston & Snow and handled a variety of complex litigation matters in state and federal court. Mr. Kobrick has handled a number of cases involving significant legal issues at the trial and appellate level that have been reported, including McMunn v. Pirelli Tire, LLC, 161 F. Supp.2d 97 (D. Conn. 2001); SEC v. Pinez, 989 F. Supp. 325 (D. Mass. 1997); Mertens v. Hewitt, 508 U.S. 248 (1993); A.L. v. Commonwealth, 521 N.E.2d 1017 (Mass. 1988); Adedeji v. United States, 1988 U.S. Dist. Lexis, 17269 (D. Mass. 1988); Blackburn v. Snow, 771 F.2d 556 (1st Cir. 1985); Princiotta v. New England Telephone. Co., 532 F. Supp. 1009 (D. Mass. 1982); Lynch v. King, 550 F. Supp. 325 (D. Mass. 1982), affirmed sub nom Lynch v. Dukakis, 719 F.2d 504 (1st Cir. 1983); DeVasto v. Faherty, 658 F.2d 859 (1st Cir. 1981);Wolf v. Commissioner of Public Welfare, 327 N.E.2d 885 (Mass. 1975); Leonard v. United States Postal Service, 489 F.2d 814 (1st Cir. 1974).

Mr. Kobrick has taught a course in Federal Litigation at Stanford Law School since 1998 and a course there in Trial Advocacy since 2003, where he has been Consulting Professor and Lecturer in Law. He taught courses in Federal Litigation and Professional Responsibility at Harvard Law School, where he was a Lecturer on Law and Visiting Professor from 1979-1995.

He received his BA from the University of Chicago with honors and his law degree from the University of Pennsylvania Law School with honors and was Order of the Coif and an Editor of the Law Review, and clerked with a U.S. District Judge in New Orleans, Louisiana.

Qualifications

Bar Admissions

  • Massachusetts, 1970
  • California, 2003
  • U.S. District Court Northern District of California, 1993
  • U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit, 2005

Past Positions

  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Senior Trial Counsel, 1995 - 1999
  • Bingham, Dana LLP, 1991 - 1994
  • Harvard Law School , 1989 - 1991
  • Gaston & Snow, 1985 - 1989
  • Greater Boston Legal Services, 1980 - 1985
  • Hon. Fred J. Cassibry, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana, Law Clerk

Education

  • University of Pennsylvania Law School, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1969
    J.D.
    Honors: cum laude
    Honors: Order of the Coif
    Law Review: University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Editor
  • University of Chicago, 1966
    B.A.
    Honors: cum laude
    Major: American History

Fees

Accepts Credit Cards

Office Information

Address

177 Bovet RoadSuite 600 San Mateo, CA 94402

Fax

  • 650-350-4333

When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.

Write Your Review

Fields marked with an * are required

1. Rating

Overall rating

How would you rate your overall experience with this lawyer?

Use the up and down arrows to increase or decrease the rating

Please Rate
Optional ratings
Value
Please Rate
Quality Of Service
Please Rate
Professional Competence
Please Rate

2. Review

Please share your opinion of working with this attorney. Do not reveal personal information or details about your case. All submitted reviews are shared with the attorney prior to publishing.

Your feedback must be at least 50 characters.Your review must be at least 50 characters
I would recommend this attorney to friends and family:

3. Verification

Keep my name anonymous from public view:
Customer Type
Please choose one

Unable to send request

By submitting this form you agree to receive email communications from FindLaw related to the management of your review.

Privacy Statement Contact Lawyer FAQ

Map Location

Google Map

How do I choose a lawyer?

Consider the following:

Comfort Level
- Are you comfortable telling the lawyer personal information? Does the lawyer seem interested in solving your problem?

Credentials
- How long has the lawyer been in practice? Has the lawyer worked on other cases similar to yours?

Cost
- How are the lawyer's fees structured - hourly or flat fee? Can the lawyer estimate the cost of your case?

City
- Is the lawyer's office conveniently located?

Not sure what questions to ask a lawyer?

Here are a few to get you started:

  • How long have you been in practice?
  • How many cases like mine have you handled?
  • How often do you settle cases out of court?
  • What are your fees and costs?
  • What are the next steps?

Want to check lawyer discipline?

It is always a good idea to research your lawyer prior to hiring. Every state has a disciplinary organization that monitors attorneys, their licenses, and consumer complaints. By researching lawyer discipline you can:

  • Ensure the attorney is currently licensed to practice in your state
  • Gain an understanding of his or her historical disciplinary record, if any.
  • Determine the seriousness of complaints/issues which could range from late bar fees to more serious issues requiring disciplinary action.

Find a Lawyer

More Options