Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Enter legal issue and location

Matthew D. Schelkopf - Ontario, CA

3287 East Guasti RoadSuite 100 Ontario, CA 91761

Updated: 04/18/2017

Ontario Litigation Lawyer

About Matthew D. Schelkopf

Practice Areas

  • Litigation
  • Class actions involving automotive defects
  • Consumer Protection
  • Defective Products

Qualifications

Bar Admissions

  • Pennsylvania, 2002
  • New Jersey, 2002
  • U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit
  • U.S. District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania
  • U.S. District Court District of New Jersey

Other Affiliations

  • American Bar Association
  • Pennsylvania Bar Association
  • Philadelphia Bar Association
  • Philadelphia Trial Lawyers Association

Education

  • Villanova University School of Law, Villanova, Pennsylvania, 2008
    LL.M.
  • Widener University School of Law, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 2002
    J.D.
    Honors: Moot Court Honor Society, Executive Board Trial Advocacy Honor Society
  • Pennsylvania State University, 1999
    B.A.
  • University of Geneva Graduate Institute in Geneva, Switzerland
    Major: Health Law and International Criminal Law

Pro Bono Activities

  • Montgomery Child Advocacy Project
  • Legal Aid of Southeastern Pennsylvania

Achievements

Honors

  • Lawyers on the Fast Track – 2012
  • Pennsylvania Super Lawyers, Rising Star – 2010-2015
  • National Trial Lawyers: Top 40 under 40 – 2012-2015
  • National Order of Barristers

Photo

Office Information

Address

3287 East Guasti RoadSuite 100 Ontario, CA 91761

Fax

  • (909) 557-1275

Office Hours

8:00 am - 5:00 pm, M-F

Publication

Representative Cases

  • Afzal v. BMW of North America, LLC, et al., (class action on behalf of purchasers and lessees of BMW M3 vehicles with S65 engines containing an alleged rotating assembly defect resulting in engine failure)
  • Bang v. BMW of North America, LLC, et al., (class action on behalf of hundreds of thousands of purchasers and lessees of certain BMW vehicles with N63 engines containing alleged oil consumption defect)
  • Davitt v. Honda North America, Inc., (class action on behalf of hundreds of thousands of purchasers and lessees of Honda CR-V vehicles with alleged defective door lock actuators)
  • Henderson v. Volvo Cars of North America LLC, et al., (class action on behalf of 90,000 purchasers and lessees of Volvo vehicles with defective GM4T65 automatic transmissions)
  • Lax v. Toyota Motor Corporation (class action on behalf of hundreds of thousands of purchasers and lessees of certain Toyota vehicles with alleged oil consumption defect)
  • Mendoza v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc., (class action on behalf of hundreds of thousands of purchasers and lessees of certain Hyundai Sonata vehicles with alleged connecting rod bearing defect resulting in engine failure)
  • Neale v. Volvo Cars of North America LLC, et al., (certified class action on behalf of hundreds of thousands of purchasers and lessees of certain Volvo vehicles with alleged defective sunroof water drainage systems)
  • Rivera v. Ford Motor Company, (class action on behalf of hundreds of thousands of purchasers and lessees of certain Ford Focus vehicles with alleged defective Evaporative Emission Control (EVAP) systems causing sudden and unexpected engine stalling)
  • Wallis v. Kia Motors America, Inc., (class action on behalf of hundreds of thousands of purchasers and lessees of certain Kia vehicles with alleged connecting rod bearing defect resulting in engine failure)
  • Whalen v. Ford Motor Co., (class action on behalf of hundreds of thousands of purchasers and lessees of certain Ford and Lincoln vehicles with alleged defective MyFord Touch infotainment systems)
  • Yaeger v. Subaru of America, Inc., (class action on behalf of hundreds of thousands of purchasers and lessees of certain Subaru vehicles with alleged oil consumption defect)
  • In re Checking Account Overdraft Litig., (class action resulting in a $55 million settlement with US Bank; $14.5 million settlement with Comerica)
  • In re Stericycle Inc., Sterisafe Contract Litigation, (commercial litigation brought on behalf of medical waste disposal customers of Stericycle regarding alleged automated price increases in violation of contractual terms)
  • Rangel v. Cardell Cabinetry, LLC, (Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) litigation brought on behalf of former employees)
  • Smith v. Gaiam, ($10 million consumer class action settlement, which provided full relief to the class)
  • C.W. v. Cooper Health System, 388 N.J. 42 (NJ App. 2006)
  • Miller v. Ginsberg, 2005 Pa. Super 136 (Pa. Super. 2005)

When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.

Write Your Review

Fields marked with an * are required

1. Rating

Overall rating

How would you rate your overall experience with this lawyer?

Use the up and down arrows to increase or decrease the rating

Please Rate
Optional ratings
Value
Please Rate
Quality Of Service
Please Rate
Professional Competence
Please Rate

2. Review

Please share your opinion of working with this attorney. Do not reveal personal information or details about your case. All submitted reviews are shared with the attorney prior to publishing.

Your feedback must be at least 50 characters.Your review must be at least 50 characters
I would recommend this attorney to friends and family:

3. Verification

Keep my name anonymous from public view:
Customer Type
Please choose one

Please confirm you are not a robot

By submitting this form you agree to receive email communications from FindLaw related to the management of your review.

Privacy Statement Contact Lawyer FAQ

Call us at 909-345-8110

Fields marked with an * are required

Preferred contact method
DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this web site is intended to convey general information. It should not be construed as legal advice or opinion. It is not an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The use of the internet or this contact form for communication is not necessarily a secure environment. Contacting a lawyer or law firm email through this service will not create an attorney-client relationship, and information will not necessarily be treated as privileged or confidential.

Firm Address

Fax:
(909) 557-1275
Google Map
3287 East Guasti RoadSuite 100 Ontario, CA 91761

Find a Lawyer

More Options