Enter legal issue and location
Matthew D. Schelkopf - Ontario, CA
3287 East Guasti RoadSuite 100 Ontario, CA 91761
McCune Wright Arevalo, LLP
Updated: 04/18/2017
Your Profile? Update Now
Ontario Litigation Lawyer
- Law Firm Info
- Reviews
- Go through email verification, and reviewers must verify their email addresses.
- Can be confirmed and flagged as a verified client by law firms.
- Can be reported and subjected to removal if they violate FindLaw.com's Terms of Service.
FindLaw.com is doing its part in combating fake reviews. All reviews:
Click here to view our Terms of Service.
About Matthew D. Schelkopf
Practice Areas
- Litigation
- Class actions involving automotive defects
- Consumer Protection
- Defective Products
Qualifications
Bar Admissions
- Pennsylvania, 2002
- New Jersey, 2002
- U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit
- U.S. District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania
- U.S. District Court District of New Jersey
Other Affiliations
- American Bar Association
- Pennsylvania Bar Association
- Philadelphia Bar Association
- Philadelphia Trial Lawyers Association
Education
- Villanova University School of Law, Villanova, Pennsylvania, 2008
LL.M. - Widener University School of Law, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 2002
J.D.
Honors: Moot Court Honor Society, Executive Board Trial Advocacy Honor Society - Pennsylvania State University, 1999
B.A. - University of Geneva Graduate Institute in Geneva, Switzerland
Major: Health Law and International Criminal Law
Pro Bono Activities
- Montgomery Child Advocacy Project
- Legal Aid of Southeastern Pennsylvania
Achievements
Honors
- Lawyers on the Fast Track – 2012
- Pennsylvania Super Lawyers, Rising Star – 2010-2015
- National Trial Lawyers: Top 40 under 40 – 2012-2015
- National Order of Barristers
Video & Photo
Photo
Office Information
Address
3287 East Guasti RoadSuite 100 Ontario, CA 91761
Phone
Fax
- (909) 557-1275
Offers Free Initial Consultation
Yes
Office Hours
8:00 am - 5:00 pm, M-F
Publication
Representative Cases
- Afzal v. BMW of North America, LLC, et al., (class action on behalf of purchasers and lessees of BMW M3 vehicles with S65 engines containing an alleged rotating assembly defect resulting in engine failure)
- Bang v. BMW of North America, LLC, et al., (class action on behalf of hundreds of thousands of purchasers and lessees of certain BMW vehicles with N63 engines containing alleged oil consumption defect)
- Davitt v. Honda North America, Inc., (class action on behalf of hundreds of thousands of purchasers and lessees of Honda CR-V vehicles with alleged defective door lock actuators)
- Henderson v. Volvo Cars of North America LLC, et al., (class action on behalf of 90,000 purchasers and lessees of Volvo vehicles with defective GM4T65 automatic transmissions)
- Lax v. Toyota Motor Corporation (class action on behalf of hundreds of thousands of purchasers and lessees of certain Toyota vehicles with alleged oil consumption defect)
- Mendoza v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc., (class action on behalf of hundreds of thousands of purchasers and lessees of certain Hyundai Sonata vehicles with alleged connecting rod bearing defect resulting in engine failure)
- Neale v. Volvo Cars of North America LLC, et al., (certified class action on behalf of hundreds of thousands of purchasers and lessees of certain Volvo vehicles with alleged defective sunroof water drainage systems)
- Rivera v. Ford Motor Company, (class action on behalf of hundreds of thousands of purchasers and lessees of certain Ford Focus vehicles with alleged defective Evaporative Emission Control (EVAP) systems causing sudden and unexpected engine stalling)
- Wallis v. Kia Motors America, Inc., (class action on behalf of hundreds of thousands of purchasers and lessees of certain Kia vehicles with alleged connecting rod bearing defect resulting in engine failure)
- Whalen v. Ford Motor Co., (class action on behalf of hundreds of thousands of purchasers and lessees of certain Ford and Lincoln vehicles with alleged defective MyFord Touch infotainment systems)
- Yaeger v. Subaru of America, Inc., (class action on behalf of hundreds of thousands of purchasers and lessees of certain Subaru vehicles with alleged oil consumption defect)
- In re Checking Account Overdraft Litig., (class action resulting in a $55 million settlement with US Bank; $14.5 million settlement with Comerica)
- In re Stericycle Inc., Sterisafe Contract Litigation, (commercial litigation brought on behalf of medical waste disposal customers of Stericycle regarding alleged automated price increases in violation of contractual terms)
- Rangel v. Cardell Cabinetry, LLC, (Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) litigation brought on behalf of former employees)
- Smith v. Gaiam, ($10 million consumer class action settlement, which provided full relief to the class)
- C.W. v. Cooper Health System, 388 N.J. 42 (NJ App. 2006)
- Miller v. Ginsberg, 2005 Pa. Super 136 (Pa. Super. 2005)
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.
Call us at 909-345-8110
Firm Address
Phone:
Fax:
(909) 557-1275
