Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Enter legal issue and location

Scott M. Bonesteel - Irvine, CA

38 Corporate Park Irvine, CA 92606

Updated: 05/15/2024

Irvine Construction Lawyer


Mr. Bonesteel joined Kring & Chung, LLP in 2010. His practice focuses primarily on complex product liability litigation, including personal injury, construction defect, and product-based class actions.

Mr. Bonesteel attended the University of California San Diego, where he obtained a BA in 1976. He received his JD from the University of San Diego in 1986. He previously practiced at the Santa Monica and San Diego offices of Haight, Brown & Bonesteel as well as at the former prominent San Diego defense firm, McInnis, Fitzgerald, Rees, Sharkey & McIntyre. In addition to the California Bar, Mr. Bonesteel is admitted to practice before the Northern, Central and Southern United States District Courts, the Ninth Circuit and the United States Supreme Court.

As a California attorney since 1986, his practice has been devoted to civil litigation defense in the areas of personal injury, product liability and construction litigation. Over that time, he has tried numerous civil actions, before both bench and jury. These include trials involving wrongful death, catastrophic personal injury, soils pollution, and construction defect matters on behalf of both developers and subcontractor entities. In recent years, Mr. Bonesteel has handled the defense of several product-based class actions involving construction products, trailers, motorhomes and pre-manufactured homes-during which he succeeded in defeating five straight actions at the class certification motion stage. His various recent trials include a defense verdict in a seven-figure claim for an allegedly defective refrigeration system installed aboard a Monterey-based commercial fishing vessel and a successful jury verdict in the noted Chauncey v. Bella Palermo HOA ‘second-hand smoke' litigation-believed to be the first successful verdict of its kind in California.

In addition to his litigation practice, Mr. Bonesteel has handled a significant number of appellate matters, including briefing and arguments before the Ninth Circuit, the California Appellate and Supreme Courts. His published opinions include Moore v. IBEW (1993) 989 F2d 1534 and the significant California Supreme Court decision in Elsner v. Uveges (2004) 34 Cal.4th 915, dealing with the admissibility of Cal-OSHA provisions in third-party civil litigation.

Prior to his legal career, Mr. Bonesteel worked in the commercial fishing industry from 1976-1982, where he became a U.S. Coast Guard licensed Merchant Marine Chief Engineer. He carries over his passion for all things mechanical into his complex product litigation practice and into building and restoring 1930's hot rods in his spare time.

About Scott M. Bonesteel

Current Employment Position(s)

  • Partner

Practice Areas

  • Construction
  • Personal Injury
  • Products Liability


Bar Admissions

  • California, 1986
  • U.S. District Court Northern District of California, 2003
  • U.S. District Court Southern District of California, 1988
  • U.S. District Court Central District of California, 1986
  • U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit, 1992
  • U.S. Supreme Court, 1994

Past Positions

  • Haight, Brown & Bonesteel
  • McInnis, Fitzgerald, Rees, Sharkey & McIntyre
  • The Commercial Fishing Industry , Merchant Marine Chief Engineer, 1976 - 1982


  • University of San Diego School of Law, San Diego, California, 1986
    Juris Doctor
  • University of California, San Diego, California, 1976
    B.A., Bachelor of Arts
    Major: History


Accepts Credit Cards

Office Information


38 Corporate Park Irvine, CA 92606


  • 949-261-8800

When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.

Write Your Review

Fields marked with an * are required

1. Rating

Overall rating

How would you rate your overall experience with this lawyer?

Use the up and down arrows to increase or decrease the rating

Please Rate
Optional ratings
Please Rate
Quality Of Service
Please Rate
Professional Competence
Please Rate

2. Review

Please share your opinion of working with this attorney. Do not reveal personal information or details about your case. All submitted reviews are shared with the attorney prior to publishing.

Your feedback must be at least 50 characters.Your review must be at least 50 characters
I would recommend this attorney to friends and family:

3. Verification

Keep my name anonymous from public view:
Customer Type
Please choose one

Unable to send request

By submitting this form you agree to receive email communications from FindLaw related to the management of your review.

Privacy Statement Contact Lawyer FAQ

Map Location

Google Map

How do I choose a lawyer?

Consider the following:

Comfort Level
- Are you comfortable telling the lawyer personal information? Does the lawyer seem interested in solving your problem?

- How long has the lawyer been in practice? Has the lawyer worked on other cases similar to yours?

- How are the lawyer's fees structured - hourly or flat fee? Can the lawyer estimate the cost of your case?

- Is the lawyer's office conveniently located?

Not sure what questions to ask a lawyer?

Here are a few to get you started:

  • How long have you been in practice?
  • How many cases like mine have you handled?
  • How often do you settle cases out of court?
  • What are your fees and costs?
  • What are the next steps?

Want to check lawyer discipline?

It is always a good idea to research your lawyer prior to hiring. Every state has a disciplinary organization that monitors attorneys, their licenses, and consumer complaints. By researching lawyer discipline you can:

  • Ensure the attorney is currently licensed to practice in your state
  • Gain an understanding of his or her historical disciplinary record, if any.
  • Determine the seriousness of complaints/issues which could range from late bar fees to more serious issues requiring disciplinary action.

Find a Lawyer

More Options