Enter legal issue and location
Boston Arbitration and Teacher Tenure Law Firm
About Diana Stasia Gondek
- Arbitration and Teacher Tenure
- Civil Rights/Discrimination Law
- Conflict of Interest Law
- Constitutional Law
- Discipline of Students
- Liability for Negligence
- Municipal Finance Law
- Open Meeting Law
- Public Records Law
- Retirement Law
- Unfair Labor Practices
- Vocational Education
- Education Law 100%
- Recipient, Dedicated Service as Legal Counsel and Presenter at The Education Law Institutes, Massachusetts Association of School Business Officials (M.A.S.B.O.)
- The Massachusetts School Law Disgest, M.A.S.B.O., Bimonthly, 1993
- The Legal Status of Professional Personnel in the Public Schools, M.A.S.B.O., 1986
- Issues and Concerns of Importance to Public School Officials, Greater Lawrence Educational Collaborative, Vol. II, 1988
- Issues and Concerns of Importance to Public School Officials, Greater Lawrence Educational Collaborative, Vol. I, 1986
- General Law of Education Relating to School Committees, M.A.S.B.O. Cooperative Corporation, January, 1984
Classes and Seminars
Presenter, The Education Law Institute (Annual Conference), M.A.S.B.O.
- Presenter, Various Statewide In-Service Training Programs, Workshops and Seminars to Educators on School Law
- Massachusetts Association of School Business Officials
- The School Committee of the Town of Holbrook, Massachusetts
- The School Committee of the Town of Rockland, Massachusetts
- Foudy v. Amherst-Pelham Regional School Committee, 402 Mass.179, 521 N.E.2d 391 (Mass. 1988)
- Matthews v. School Committee of Bedford, 22 Mass.App.Ct.374, 494 N.E.2d 38 (Mass.App.Ct. 1986)
- McParland v. Rosencranz, 629 N.E.2d 369 (Mass.App.Ct. 1994)
- School Committee of Holbrook v. Holbrook Education Association, 395 Mass.651, 481 N.E.2d 484 (Mass. 1985)
- School Committee of Town of Rockland v. Massachusetts Department of Education, 753 F.2d 169 (1st Cir. 1985)
- Doe v. Anrig, 561 F.Supp. 121 (D.C.Mass. 1983)
- Dale Wilson v. Labor Relations Commission, 96-P-193 (Massachusetts Appeals Court 1997)
- Direnzo v. Gerhart, 94-J602 (Massachusetts Appeals Court 1994)
- Timothy Russell v. Peter L. Nixon, trustee & other, 01-P-704 (Massachusetts Appeals Court 2003)
- Dale Wilson v. Labor Relations Commission, 00-P-598 (Massachusetts Appeals Court 2002)
- John McParland v. James Rosencranz, Esq., 93-P-368 (Massachusetts Appeals Court 1994)
- Braintree Baptist Temple v. Holbrook Public Schools, 616 F.Supp.81 (D.Mass. 1984)
- Doe v. Anrig, 692 F.2d 800 (1st Cir. 1982)
- Diana Stasia Gondek (Sole Practitioner)
6 Beacon Street Suite 200 Boston, MA 02108
- (617) 523-2712
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our West Legal Directory disclaimers. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.
How do I choose a lawyer?
Consider the following:
- Comfort Level
- - Are you comfortable telling the lawyer personal information? Does the lawyer seem interested in solving your problem?
- - How long has the lawyer been in practice? Has the lawyer worked on other cases similar to yours?
- - How are the lawyer's fees structured - hourly or flat fee? Can the lawyer estimate the cost of your case?
- - Is the lawyer's office conveniently located?
Not sure what questions to ask a lawyer?
Here are a few to get you started:
- How long have you been in practice?
- How many cases like mine have you handled?
- How often do you settle cases out of court?
- What are your fees and costs?
- What are the next steps?
Want to check lawyer discipline?
It is always a good idea to research your lawyer prior to hiring. Every state has a disciplinary organization that monitors attorneys, their licenses, and consumer complaints. By researching lawyer discipline you can:
- Ensure the attorney is currently licensed to practice in your state
- Gain an understanding of his or her historical disciplinary record, if any.
- Determine the seriousness of complaints/issues which could range from late bar fees to more serious issues requiring disciplinary action.