Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Enter legal issue and location

Harvey B. Heafitz Esq. - Sudbury, MA

365 Boston Post RoadSuite 200 Sudbury, MA 01776

Updated: 01/16/2024

Sudbury Contract Negotiation and Formation Lawyer

Overview

Harvey Heafitz holds a Bachelor of Science degree in mechanical engineering from Northeastern University, and a Juris Doctor degree from Suffolk University. After earning his engineering degree, Harvey worked for two years in the aerospace industry in Hartford, Connecticut. Following law school, Attorney Heafitz practiced for five years at a general practice firm in Watertown, MA, before opening his own firm in 1978...

Harvey Heafitz holds a Bachelor of Science degree in mechanical engineering from Northeastern University, and a Juris Doctor degree from Suffolk University. After earning his engineering degree, Harvey worked for two years in the aerospace industry in Hartford, Connecticut. Following law school, Attorney Heafitz practiced for five years at a general practice firm in Watertown, MA, before opening his own firm in 1978.

Attorney Heafitz has been litigating contract cases through trial and appeal, predominantly on behalf of general contractors and subcontractors, for forty-two years. Attorney Heafitz practices in the State and Federal Courts in Massachusetts, and has practiced in Federal Courts in Maine, New Hampshire and Connecticut. Harvey has tried cases on changed conditions, design defects, interpretation of contract language, and breach of contract.

Mr. Heafitz's Appeals Court decisions include several cases of first impression, have established significant landmark decisions for clients, and have redefined the interpretation of various public construction statutes.

Attorney Heafitz is AV rated by Martindale-Hubbell.

REPRESENTATIVE CASES

Sutton Corporation v. Metropolitan District Commission, 423 Mass. 200 (1992)

First case in Massachusetts wherein the Supreme Judicial Court upheld a finding of a "type two changed condition" under M.G.L. c. 30, § 39N, and determined it to be actionable in Massachusetts. A type two changed condition under c. 30, §39N occurs when the contractor encounters an unforeseen condition that while not an unforeseen item or quantity of material, but an unforeseen circumstance that alters the way the work must be performed. The Court stated: "Where the actual subsurface conditions differ substantially from those conditions ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in the plans and contract documents... There is a changed condition under the meaning of the statute, whether or not the conditions differ from the contract specifications. Thus, contrary to the MDC's assertions, the federal "type II" change condition is explicitly part of Massachusetts law..."

TLT Construction Corp. v. Commonwealth of Mass., Division of Capital Planning and Operations, Suffolk Superior Court C.A. No. 92-6572F (1999)

Judgment obtained against the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for a general contractor, and in addition, judgment entered for sanctions against the Commonwealth under M.G.L. c. 231 § 6F for asserting bad faith, frivolous, and insubstantial defenses. The Court awarded 150% interest, legal fees, and costs, totaling approximately $1 million. The Court stated: "This court finds that the bulk of DCPO's defenses were lacking in any factual support and were therefore, fully insubstantial, frivolous and not advanced in good faith." The court's decision increased the $2.8 million base judgment by approximately $1 million for added interest, attorney's fees and costs.

Bastianelli v. National Union Fire Inc. Co., 36 Mass.App.Ct. 367 (1994)

Interpretation of M.G.L. c. 149, § 29, the public construction bond statute, finding that proof of actual notice is sufficient to meet the statutory requirement for formal "written" notice under the statute and circumstance of that case.

Manuel F. Spencer & Sons, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 16 Mass.App.Ct. 290 (1983)

First case in Massachusetts interpreting "extra work" as used in M.G.L. c. 30, § 39F, the public works subcontractor direct payment statute from MDPW to the client for that extra work.

About Harvey B. Heafitz Esq.

Current Employment Position(s)

  • Of Counsel

Practice Areas

  • Contract Negotiation and Formation
  • Construction Litigation
  • Bid Protests
  • Contract Disputes
  • Insurance Coverage Disputes
  • Administrative Law

Representative Cases

  • Sutton Corporation v. Metropolitan District Commission, 423 Mass. 200 (1992)
  • TLT Construction Corp. v. Commonwealth of Mass., Division of Capital Planning and Operations, Suffolk Superior Court C.A. No. 92–6572F (1999)
  • Bastianelli v. National Union Fire Inc. Co., 36 Mass.App.Ct. 367 (1994)
  • Manuel F. Spencer & Sons, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 16 Mass.App.Ct. 290 (1983)

Qualifications

Bar Admissions

  • Massachusetts, 1973
  • U.S. District Court District of Massachusetts, 1975
  • U.S. Court of Appeals Federal Circuit, 1986
  • U.S. Federal Courts, 1974

Education

  • Suffolk University Law School, Boston, Massachusetts
    J.D., Doctor of Jurisprudence
  • Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts
    B.S., Bachelor of Science
    Major: Mechanical Engineering

Office Information

Address

365 Boston Post RoadSuite 200 Sudbury, MA 01776

Fax

  • 978-443-7773

Achievements

Honors

  • AV rated by Martindale-Hubbell

When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.

Write Your Review

Fields marked with an * are required

1. Rating

Overall rating

How would you rate your overall experience with this lawyer?

Use the up and down arrows to increase or decrease the rating

Please Rate
Optional ratings
Value
Please Rate
Quality Of Service
Please Rate
Professional Competence
Please Rate

2. Review

Please share your opinion of working with this attorney. Do not reveal personal information or details about your case. All submitted reviews are shared with the attorney prior to publishing.

Your feedback must be at least 50 characters.Your review must be at least 50 characters
I would recommend this attorney to friends and family:

3. Verification

Keep my name anonymous from public view:
Customer Type
Please choose one

Unable to send request

By submitting this form you agree to receive email communications from FindLaw related to the management of your review.

Privacy Statement Contact Lawyer FAQ

Map Location

Google Map

How do I choose a lawyer?

Consider the following:

Comfort Level
- Are you comfortable telling the lawyer personal information? Does the lawyer seem interested in solving your problem?

Credentials
- How long has the lawyer been in practice? Has the lawyer worked on other cases similar to yours?

Cost
- How are the lawyer's fees structured - hourly or flat fee? Can the lawyer estimate the cost of your case?

City
- Is the lawyer's office conveniently located?

Not sure what questions to ask a lawyer?

Here are a few to get you started:

  • How long have you been in practice?
  • How many cases like mine have you handled?
  • How often do you settle cases out of court?
  • What are your fees and costs?
  • What are the next steps?

Want to check lawyer discipline?

It is always a good idea to research your lawyer prior to hiring. Every state has a disciplinary organization that monitors attorneys, their licenses, and consumer complaints. By researching lawyer discipline you can:

  • Ensure the attorney is currently licensed to practice in your state
  • Gain an understanding of his or her historical disciplinary record, if any.
  • Determine the seriousness of complaints/issues which could range from late bar fees to more serious issues requiring disciplinary action.

Find a Lawyer

More Options