Enter legal issue and location
Updated: 09/02/2021
Your Profile? Update Now
Columbus Age Discrimination Law Firm
Overview
Carmen R. Matos, Esquire, specializes in employment mediation. She has 22 years experience in mediation and was a litigator representing employees and employers in employment discrimination and civil rights cases for 40 years. Ms. Matos, a graduate of Temple University Beasley School of Law, worked 15 years with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission as a trial and supervising attorney...
MoreCarmen R. Matos, Esquire, specializes in employment mediation. She has 22 years experience in mediation and was a litigator representing employees and employers in employment discrimination and civil rights cases for 40 years. Ms. Matos, a graduate of Temple University Beasley School of Law, worked 15 years with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission as a trial and supervising attorney...Carmen R. Matos, Esquire, specializes in employment mediation. She has 22 years experience in mediation and was a litigator representing employees and employers in employment discrimination and civil rights cases for 40 years. Ms. Matos, a graduate of Temple University Beasley School of Law, worked 15 years with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission as a trial and supervising attorney.Since 1995, she has been in private practice in employment law representing employers and employees. In 1998 when EEOC began its mediaiton pilot program, Ms. Matos was one of the initial EEOC mediators certified by EEOC to mediate employment cases. Ms. Matos has been an EEOC contract mediator since 2001. In 2015 Ms. Matos was certified as a civil mediator by the Florida Supreme Court. As a litigator Ms. Matos is known for her expertise in age discrimination: In Steward v Sears, Roebuck & Co. 231 Fed. Appx. 201, 2007 US App. Lexis 19365 (August 14, 2007) Ms. Matos convincingly argued to the Third Circuit that the district judge erred in granting judgment to the defendant after an eight day jury trial resulted in a verdict for her client in the amount of $240,095. In this important case, Ms. Matos convinced the Court that the average the ages of remaining employees to determine what is a significant age difference to establish the prima facie case, but rather consider all the circumstances. In October 2005, Mrs. Matos obtained a jury verdict of $200,000 in the case of Ridley v. Costco Wholesale Foods Corp. (race and reprisal discrimination), upheld by the Third Circuit in 2007, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 2493. In O'Neill v. Sears, 108 F.Supp. 2d 433 (E.D. PA. 2000), Ms. Matos obtained a jury verdict of $519,068 plus $143,000 in attorney fees.She successfully convinced the court to grant an additional amount of damages ($38,000) to her client for negative tax consequences. In Becker v. ARCO, 15 F.Supp.2d 600 (E.D. PA 1998), Ms. Matos obtained a settlement of $600,000 for a chemist who worked for ARCO for 24 years. While at the EEOC, Ms. Matos settled the case of EEOC v. Kaiser Aluminum for $1.6 million for 46 older employees who claimed age discrimination. Ms. Matos received the Chairman's Award from Chairman Clarence Thomas, now Justice Thomas, USSC in 1988 for the Kaiser case. In 1995 Ms. received the Chairman's award for the second time due to her work in the Scott Doe and EEOC v. Kohn Nast & Graf AIDS disability case similar to the Philadelphia story movie. Ms. Matos conducts training on various employment discrimination issues. For example, for several years, she trained the Trainers at the Supreme Court of NJ in management liability for sexual harassment. She also trained managers in private companies on employment issues.Ms. Matos published articles on employment law in the Legal Intelligencer.Some of these include "The Many Faces of Sexual Harassment," "The Civil Rights Act of 1991,""Recent Developments in Age Discrimination," "Recent Developments in ADA Cases," and others.She frequently conducts employment bar seminars for the Pennsylvania Bar Institute. She conducted EEO Investigation Training for the NY Transit Authority. Ms. Matos investigates cases of sexual harassment for employers. She has been involved in Hispanic Bar Association, American Bar Association, National Employment Lawyers Association, and Girl Scouts of America as a leader. She is fluent in Spanish, having obtained a Master of Arts in Spanish and Latin American Literature. Alternate phone number is 609-558-9436. From 2013-2019 Ms. Matos was recognized as a Super Lawyer by Philadelphia Magazine. See also carmenmatos.com for more information.- Law Firm Info
- Reviews
- Go through email verification, and reviewers must verify their email addresses.
- Can be confirmed and flagged as a verified client by law firms.
- Can be reported and subjected to removal if they violate FindLaw.com's Terms of Service.
FindLaw.com is doing its part in combating fake reviews. All reviews:
Click here to view our Terms of Service.
About Carmen R. Matos Mediation, Investigation & Training
Languages
- Spanish
Practice Areas
- Age Discrimination
- Americans with Disabilities Act - - Employee
- Appellate Representation
- Arbitration of employment disputes
- Employment Contracts - - Employee
- Federal Sector employees
- Management Representation
- Mediation of employment disputes
- National Origin Discrimination
- Personal Injury
- Race Discrimination
- Religious discrimination
- Reprisal
- Sex Discrimination
- Sexual Harassment
- Unemployment Compensation
- Wrongful Termination
Representative Cases
- Gunnar Steward v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 312 F.Supp.2d 719 (E.D. Pa. 2004)
- Danita Kent Byrd and EEOC v. Wyeth Pharmaceutical, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 4382 (E.D. Pa. 2004)
- Willie Carter v. Potter, U.S. Postal Service, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 25677
- John Doe v. Kohn, Nast & Graf, 862 F. Supp. 1310 (E.D. Pa. 1994)
- John Doe v. Kohn, Nast & Graf, 853 F. Supp. 150 (E.D. Pa. 1994)
- James Shovlin v. TimeMed, 1997 U.S. Dist. Lexis 248 (E.D. Pa. 1997)
- Richard P. O'Neill v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 108 F. Supp. 2d 433 (E.D. Pa. 2000)
- Richard P. O'Neill v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 108 F. Supp. 2d 443 (E.D. Pa. 2000)
- William P. Becker v. ARCO Chemical Corp., 15 F.Supp.2d 621 (E.D. Pa. 1997)
- Denise E. Heap v. ICM America LLC, et al., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16418 (E.D. Pa. 2000)
- Ridley v. Costco Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23276 (E.D. Pa. 2005)
- Ridley v Costco Inc, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 2493 (Third Circuit Court of Appeals 2007)
Office Information
Address
6 Moran DriveSpringfield Twp. Columbus, NJ 08022
Fax
- 215-345-8551
Websites
Disclosure: No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.
Map Location
How do I choose a lawyer?
Consider the following:
- Comfort Level
- - Are you comfortable telling the lawyer personal information? Does the lawyer seem interested in solving your problem?
- Credentials
- - How long has the lawyer been in practice? Has the lawyer worked on other cases similar to yours?
- Cost
- - How are the lawyer's fees structured - hourly or flat fee? Can the lawyer estimate the cost of your case?
- City
- - Is the lawyer's office conveniently located?
Not sure what questions to ask a lawyer?
Here are a few to get you started:
- How long have you been in practice?
- How many cases like mine have you handled?
- How often do you settle cases out of court?
- What are your fees and costs?
- What are the next steps?
Want to check lawyer discipline?
It is always a good idea to research your lawyer prior to hiring. Every state has a disciplinary organization that monitors attorneys, their licenses, and consumer complaints. By researching lawyer discipline you can:
- Ensure the attorney is currently licensed to practice in your state
- Gain an understanding of his or her historical disciplinary record, if any.
- Determine the seriousness of complaints/issues which could range from late bar fees to more serious issues requiring disciplinary action.
