Enter legal issue and location
Arthur F. Fergenson - Columbia , MD
10400 Little Patuxent ParkwaySuite 300 Columbia , MD 21044
Ansa Assuncao LLP
Columbia National Trial Practice Lawyer
Overview
Arthur Fergenson litigates. From over 40 years of experience in the law, Mr. Fergenson employs what he has learned and applies it in a practice focused on appeals and major motions. With skills honed by clerkships in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and in the Supreme Court of the United States for then-Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, Mr. Fergenson understands the power of ideas persuasively argued before courts of any jurisdiction...
Arthur Fergenson litigates. From over 40 years of experience in the law, Mr. Fergenson employs what he has learned and applies it in a practice focused on appeals and major motions. With skills honed by clerkships in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and in the Supreme Court of the United States for then-Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, Mr. Fergenson understands the power of ideas persuasively argued before courts of any jurisdiction...
Arthur Fergenson litigates. From over 40 years of experience in the law, Mr. Fergenson employs what he has learned and applies it in a practice focused on appeals and major motions. With skills honed by clerkships in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and in the Supreme Court of the United States for then-Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, Mr. Fergenson understands the power of ideas persuasively argued before courts of any jurisdiction. He also knows the importance of creating a record at the trial level that can protect a favorable judgment on appeal, or enhance the ability of a lawyer to overturn on appeal an unfavorable result below.
Mr. Fergenson graduated from Dartmouth College with a degree in Drama, summa cum laude, and as a junior year Phi Beta Kappa electee. After receiving his J.D. from Yale Law School, he served as law clerk to the Honorable Thomas P. Griesa upon his appointment as a United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York. Both at the trial level and while a law clerk at U.S. Supreme Court, Mr. Fergenson received an invaluable education in the good and bad of advocacy, both written and oral. Those lessons still inform his practice.
After clerking, Mr. Fergenson associated himself with Covington & Burling in Washington, D.C. While at Covington, Mr. Fergenson was part of the small team that challenged the constitutionality of federal campaign legislation ultimately resulting in the landmark decision that invalidated key limitations on the free speech rights of Americans. After teaching corporate law, federal jurisdiction, and intellectual property at Indiana University Law School at Bloomington and University of Maryland School of Law at Baltimore, he was named General Counsel of the ACTION Agency.
Mr. Fergenson returned to Baltimore to serve as a federal prosecutor in the narcotics unit, and was responsible for civil forfeitures and the prosecution of other offenses, including a violation of the Arms Export Control Act involving Iran. As a Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, Mr. Fergenson handled the appeals that followed from the cases he prosecuted.
Mr. Fergenson re-entered private practice in 1985, and joined Ansa Assuncao after practicing at Weinberg and Green (now Saul Ewing), Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, and DLA Piper, where he was co-head of its appellate practice. During this period, he litigated complex civil cases, large and small, throughout the country. He was counsel to major stakeholders in two of the three largest life insurance insolvencies in our country's history with billions of dollars of total claims at risk: Executive Life (litigated in California state court) and Confederation Life (in Michigan state court). See, e.g., Texas Commerce Bank v. Garamendi, 11 Cal. App. 4th 460 (Ct. App., 2d Dist. 1992); Commercial Nat'l Bank v. Superior Court, 14 Cal. App. 4th 393 (Ct. App., 2d Dist. 1993). He also helped a client pursue a major claim for insolvency loss against a state guaranty association.
In January 2011, Mr. Fergenson, as counsel of record, argued a major constitutional case before the United States Supreme Court. The issue is of major consequence to businesses: what are sufficient contacts with a state that would permit you to be sued in its courts. The Supreme Court had not considered this issue for nearly a quarter century before taking this case on the petition filed by Mr. Fergenson and the other members of the Ansa Assuncao team: J. McIntyre Machinery v. Nicastro, No. 09-1343. The Supreme Court held, six to three, that it was unconstitutional to force Mr. Fergenson's client to defend a product liability tort action in New Jersey when the client had taken no action in that state and directed no activity toward that state.
Mr. Fergenson represented a major international company in a series of cases to protect its contract rights after the dot.com collapse. In one such case before a federal jury in New York, Mr. Fergenson pierced the corporate veil to hold an investment adviser liable for the wrongdoing of a portfolio company of the fund that the adviser ran; the portfolio company had contracted with Mr. Fergenson's client and had breached, but the portfolio company was insolvent. Mr. Fergenson defended the judgment successfully in the Second Circuit, domesticated the verdict in the home state of the investment adviser, and pursued the judgment debtor through bankruptcy to an ultimate recovery. From trial to appeal to collection, Mr. Fergenson was successful.
Having litigated in federal and state courts, trial and appellate, Mr. Fergenson brings his judgment, experience, and skills to bear by identifying issues and presenting them to judges with clarity on paper and orally. His goal is to find the most direct path to success for his clients.
Mr. Fergenson is rated AV by Martindale-Hubbell. He is named a Maryland SuperLawyer for 2012.
About Arthur F. Fergenson
Current Employment Position(s)
- Senior Counsel
Languages
- English
Practice Areas
- National Trial Practice
- Appellate Practice
- National Appellate and Major Motion Practice 90%
Litigation
- 95%
Representative Cases
- Texas Commerce Bank v. Garamendi, 11 Cal. App. 4th 460 (Ct. App., 2d Dist. 1992) (CA Court of Appeal, Second District 1992)
- Commercial Nat’l Bank v. Superior Court, 14 Cal. App. 4th 393 (Ct. App., 2d Dist. 1993) (CA Court of Appeal, Second District 1993)
- J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro, 564 U.S. _ (2011) (US Supreme Court 2011)
- J.C. Penney Life Ins. Co. v. Pelosi, 393 F.3d 396 (2004) (US Court of Appeals, 3d Cir. 2004)
- Vigilant Ins. Co. v. Bear Stearns Cos. Inc., 2008 NY LEXIS 542 (NY March 13, 2008) (NY Court of Appeals 2008)
- Buckley v. Valeo, 519 F.2d 821 (DC Cir. 1975); 401 F.Supp. 1235 ((USDC DC 1975) (USCA DC Circuit and USDC USDC 1975)
- Moffett v. Computer Sciences Corp., 457 F.Supp.2d 571 (D.Md. 2006) (US Dist Court for Dist of MD 2006)
Qualifications
Bar Admissions
- Maryland, 1985
- District of Columbia, 1975
- New York, 1973
- U.S. District Court Eastern District of New York, 1988
- U.S. District Court Southern District of New York, 1973
- U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia, 1975
- U.S. District Court District of Maryland, 1984
- U.S. Court of Appeals 4th Circuit, 1984
- U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit, 2002
Other Affiliations
- American Bar Association, Business Law Section, 2001 - 2011 (Editorial Board)
- Editorial Advisory Board, Maryland Daily Record, 2010 - Present (Member)
Classes and Seminars
- Corporate law, federal jurisdiction, and intellectual property, Indiana University Law School at Bloomington, 1976 - 1979
- Corporate law, federal jurisdiction, and intellectual property, University of Maryland School of Law at Baltimore, 1979 - 1981
Pro Bono Activities
- Trustee, CenterStage, Baltimore MD, 1987 - 2006
- Member, Editor in Chief, and Co-Chair, Business Law Today, Business Law Section of the ABA, 2001 - 2011
Past Positions
- DLA Piper, Partner, 2001 - 2008
- Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, Of Counsel, 1995 - 2001
- Weinberg and Green (now Saul Ewing), General Partner, 1985 - 1995
- U.S. Attorneys Office, Maryland, Federal Prosecutor, 1983 - 1985
- ACTION Agency, General Counsel, 1981 - 1982
- Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, U.S. Supreme Court, Law Clerk, 1973 - 1974
- Honorable Thomas P. Griesa, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Law Clerk, 1972 - 1973
- University of Maryland School of Law (Baltimore), Associate Professor, 1979 - 1981
- Indiana University School of Law (Bloomington), Assistant Professor, 1976 - 1979
Education
- Yale Law School, New Haven, Connecticut, 1972
J.D. - Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, 1969
B.A.
Honors: summa cum laude
Major: Drama
Office Information
Address
10400 Little Patuxent ParkwaySuite 300 Columbia , MD 21044
Phone
Fax
- 443-539-7781
- 443-539-7781
Achievements
Honors
- Rated “AV” by the Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory, 1989 - 2015
- Maryland SuperLawyer, 2012
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.
Write Your Review
Fields marked with an * are required
Map Location
How do I choose a lawyer?
Consider the following:
- Comfort Level
- - Are you comfortable telling the lawyer personal information? Does the lawyer seem interested in solving your problem?
- Credentials
- - How long has the lawyer been in practice? Has the lawyer worked on other cases similar to yours?
- Cost
- - How are the lawyer's fees structured - hourly or flat fee? Can the lawyer estimate the cost of your case?
- City
- - Is the lawyer's office conveniently located?
Not sure what questions to ask a lawyer?
Here are a few to get you started:
- How long have you been in practice?
- How many cases like mine have you handled?
- How often do you settle cases out of court?
- What are your fees and costs?
- What are the next steps?
Want to check lawyer discipline?
It is always a good idea to research your lawyer prior to hiring. Every state has a disciplinary organization that monitors attorneys, their licenses, and consumer complaints. By researching lawyer discipline you can:
- Ensure the attorney is currently licensed to practice in your state
- Gain an understanding of his or her historical disciplinary record, if any.
- Determine the seriousness of complaints/issues which could range from late bar fees to more serious issues requiring disciplinary action.