Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Enter legal issue and location

Neil S. Bromberg - Washington, DC

1350 I Street, Northwest Washington, DC 20005

Updated: 08/14/2019

Washington Complex Litigation Lawyer


Neil S. Bromberg’s practice focuses on the overall defense of serial, mass tort, and other complex litigation matters, with a particular emphasis on defending – and trying – pharmaceutical products liability litigation...

Neil S. Bromberg’s practice focuses on the overall defense of serial, mass tort, and other complex litigation matters, with a particular emphasis on defending – and trying – pharmaceutical products liability litigation. On behalf of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Mr. Bromberg currently manages the defense of 142 cases as part of a consolidated litigation in New Jersey involving claims that Novartis’s bisphosphonate drugs used in cancer therapies cause a "signature disease" known as osteonecrosis of the jaw ("ONJ"). On May 15 of this year, he secured a 7-1 defense verdict for Firm client Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in the second bellwether case chosen for trial in the New Jersey litigation over the drugs Aredia® and Zometa®. Meng v. Novartis Pharm. Corp., No. MID-L-7670-07-MT (N.J. Super. Ct. Law Div. May 15, 2013). After deliberating for fewer than six hours, the Meng jury rejected the plaintiff’s failure-to-warn claim. Mr. Bromberg also won the first bellwether trial in the New Jersey consolidated litigation in 2010. Bessemer v. Novartis Pharm. Corp., MID-L-1835-08-MT (N.J. Super. Ct. Law Div. Oct. 22, 2010), aff'd, No. L-1835-08, 2012 WL 2120777 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. June 13, 2012).

Mr. Bromberg has significant experience defending and deposing expert witnesses in various fields, including oncology, oral surgery, neurology, obstetrics, pharmacology, and internal medicine. This experience extends beyond the deposition stage, where he specializes in designing and implementing strategies to exclude (or limit) expert testimony through motions practice or evidentiary hearings pursuant to Daubert, Kemp, and similar admissibility standards.

Mr. Bromberg has extensive toxic tort experience, having previously represented gasoline manufacturers in personal injury and wrongful death litigation involving alleged exposure to benzene.

Mr. Bromberg has spoken at public and private seminars on a variety of issues including e-discovery and scientific evidence. He is a past co-chair of the December 2006 Mealey’s Benzene Litigation Conference. He previously served on the Steering Committee and was the Internet Coordinator of the Litigation Section of the Bar Association for the District of Columbia, and was also Chair of the Publications Committee and Vice Chair of the Programs Committee. Additionally, he has served as a member of the Continuing Legal Education Committee of the D.C. Bar's Board of Governors. Mr. Bromberg was nominated to run for the position of D.C. Representative to the ABA House of Delegates in 2001. In 2006, he served as an appellate judge for the American Bar Association's National Appellate Advocacy Competition. Mr. Bromberg is a member of the Defense Research Institute.

About Neil S. Bromberg

Current Employment Position(s)

  • Partner

Practice Areas

  • Complex Litigation
  • Pharmaceutical Products
  • Toxic Torts & Products Liability


Bar Admissions

  • District of Columbia, 1992
  • U.S. Court of Appeals 4th Circuit
  • New York
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Other Affiliations

  • Defense Research Institute (Member)


  • University of Pennsylvania Law School, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1991
    Honors: cum laude
    Honors: Order of the Coif
  • Brandeis University, 1988
    Honors: magna cum laude

Office Information


1350 I Street, Northwest Washington, DC 20005


  • (202) 682-1639

When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.

Write Your Review

Fields marked with an * are required

1. Rating

Overall rating

How would you rate your overall experience with this lawyer?

Use the up and down arrows to increase or decrease the rating

Please Rate
Optional ratings
Please Rate
Quality Of Service
Please Rate
Professional Competence
Please Rate

2. Review

Please share your opinion of working with this attorney. Do not reveal personal information or details about your case. All submitted reviews are shared with the attorney prior to publishing.

Your feedback must be at least 50 characters.Your review must be at least 50 characters
I would recommend this attorney to friends and family:

3. Verification

Keep my name anonymous from public view:
Customer Type
Please choose one

Unable to send request

By submitting this form you agree to receive email communications from FindLaw related to the management of your review.

Privacy Statement Contact Lawyer FAQ

Map Location

Google Map

How do I choose a lawyer?

Consider the following:

Comfort Level
- Are you comfortable telling the lawyer personal information? Does the lawyer seem interested in solving your problem?

- How long has the lawyer been in practice? Has the lawyer worked on other cases similar to yours?

- How are the lawyer's fees structured - hourly or flat fee? Can the lawyer estimate the cost of your case?

- Is the lawyer's office conveniently located?

Not sure what questions to ask a lawyer?

Here are a few to get you started:

  • How long have you been in practice?
  • How many cases like mine have you handled?
  • How often do you settle cases out of court?
  • What are your fees and costs?
  • What are the next steps?

Want to check lawyer discipline?

It is always a good idea to research your lawyer prior to hiring. Every state has a disciplinary organization that monitors attorneys, their licenses, and consumer complaints. By researching lawyer discipline you can:

  • Ensure the attorney is currently licensed to practice in your state
  • Gain an understanding of his or her historical disciplinary record, if any.
  • Determine the seriousness of complaints/issues which could range from late bar fees to more serious issues requiring disciplinary action.

Find a Lawyer

More Options