Enter legal issue and location
Thomas K. Boardman - San Francisco, CA
44 Montgomery StreetSuite 2450 San Francisco, CA 94104- 4701
Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP
San Francisco Antitrust & Trade Regulation Lawyer
Overview
Thomas K. Boardman is an associate in the firm’s San Francisco office, focusing on antitrust and business litigation. Mr. Boardman was a member of the trial team in In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation.For his work on that case, Mr. Boardman was nominated by Consumer Attorneys of California as a finalist for Consumer Attorney of the Year.Mr...
Thomas K. Boardman is an associate in the firm’s San Francisco office, focusing on antitrust and business litigation. Mr. Boardman was a member of the trial team in In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation.For his work on that case, Mr. Boardman was nominated by Consumer Attorneys of California as a finalist for Consumer Attorney of the Year.Mr...
Thomas K. Boardman is an associate in the firm’s San Francisco office, focusing on antitrust and business litigation. Mr. Boardman was a member of the trial team in In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation.For his work on that case, Mr. Boardman was nominated by Consumer Attorneys of California as a finalist for Consumer Attorney of the Year.Mr. Boardman was also an instrumental part of the lead counsel team in In re Potash Antitrust Litigation (II), a case that featured a unanimous victory before an en banc panel of the Seventh Circuit, resulting in one of the most influential antitrust appellate opinions in recent memory.The case ended in $90 million in settlements.
Mr. Boardman received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Vassar College in 2004, majoring in Political Science and Film Studies. He received his Juris Doctorate from the University of California, Hastings College of the Law in 2009. While at Hastings, Mr. Boardman was a member of the Hastings Science and Technology Law Journal and worked as a research assistant to professors Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr. and Rory K. Little. Prior to joining Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP, Mr. Boardman served as a judicial law clerk to the Hon. Christina Reiss in United States District Court, District of Vermont.
Current Cases:
·In re Lithium Ion Batteries Antitrust Litigation (N.D. Cal.)
·In Re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Litigation (N.D. Cal.)
·In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation (N.D. Cal.)
·In re Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation (N.D. Cal.)
- Law Firm Info
- Reviews
- Go through email verification, and reviewers must verify their email addresses.
- Can be confirmed and flagged as a verified client by law firms.
- Can be reported and subjected to removal if they violate FindLaw.com's Terms of Service.
Click here to view our Terms of Service.
Write Your Review
Fields marked with an * are required
How do I choose a lawyer?
Consider the following:
- Comfort Level
- - Are you comfortable telling the lawyer personal information? Does the lawyer seem interested in solving your problem?
- Credentials
- - How long has the lawyer been in practice? Has the lawyer worked on other cases similar to yours?
- Cost
- - How are the lawyer's fees structured - hourly or flat fee? Can the lawyer estimate the cost of your case?
- City
- - Is the lawyer's office conveniently located?
Not sure what questions to ask a lawyer?
Here are a few to get you started:
- How long have you been in practice?
- How many cases like mine have you handled?
- How often do you settle cases out of court?
- What are your fees and costs?
- What are the next steps?
Want to check lawyer discipline?
It is always a good idea to research your lawyer prior to hiring. Every state has a disciplinary organization that monitors attorneys, their licenses, and consumer complaints. By researching lawyer discipline you can:
- Ensure the attorney is currently licensed to practice in your state
- Gain an understanding of his or her historical disciplinary record, if any.
- Determine the seriousness of complaints/issues which could range from late bar fees to more serious issues requiring disciplinary action.