Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Moritz, Joseph J. Jr.

Joseph J. Moritz Jr. - Phoenix, AZ

Attorney at Francis J. Slavin Law Firm

Business Law Lawyers in Phoenix, AZ

2198 East Camelback Road Suite 285 Phoenix, AZ 85016

Phoenix Business Law Lawyer

Updated: 03/02/2026

Areas of Practice

  • Business Law
  • Real Estate
  • Commercial Transactions

Attorney Information

Awards and Honors

Honors

  • Recipient, Silver Key

Education

  • Legal Education

    • Wayne State University Law School, Detroit, Michigan, 1978
      J.D.
      Honors: cum laude
  • Non Legal Education

    • Wayne State University, 1974
      B.A.

Current Employment Position(s)

  • Associate

Past Positions

  • Honorable Walter P. Cynar, Michigan Court of Appeals, Law Clerk

Bar Admissions

  • Michigan, 1979
  • Arizona, 1991
  • U.S. Court of Appeals 6th Circuit, 1982
  • U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan, 1979
  • U.S. District Court Western District of Michigan, 1979
  • U.S. District Court District of Arizona, 1991

Specialties and Certifications

  • Certified Specialist, Real Estate Law, Arizona Board of Legal Specialization

Other Affiliations

  • Maricopa County Bar Association (Member)
  • Maricopa County Bar Association, Business Law Section (Member)

Be the first to write a review!

There are currently no reviews for Joseph J. Moritz Jr.. Be the first to share your experience.

Write a Review

Photo

Contact

Google Map

Phoenix, AZ

2198 East Camelback Road
Suite 285
Phoenix, AZ 85016

Directions

Phone: 602-381-8700

Fax: (602) 381-1920

Email: Send a message

  • Credit Cards Accepted

Contact Francis J. Slavin Law Firm Today

Preferred contact method
DISCLAIMER: By submitting this form you accept the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer

Your Profile?  Update Now

When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.