Michael H. Leifer - Irvine, CA
Attorney at Palmieri, Hennessey & Leifer, LLP
Business Litigation Lawyers in Irvine, CA
3 Park Plaza Suite 1950 Irvine, CA 92614
- Free Consultation
- 1 Super Lawyers®
-
38
Years
Experience
Irvine Business Litigation Lawyer
Updated: 03/02/2026
Areas of Practice
- Business Litigation
- Alternative Dispute Resolution & Mediation
- Real Estate and Construction Litigation
- Environmental Litigation
- Eminent Domain and Inverse Condemnation
- Valuation Litigation
- Lease Renewal Valuations
Attorney Information
Overview
For three decades, Mr. Leifer's practice has focused on being at the forefront of representing property owners and business owners against public agencies in the Eminent Domain or inverse condemnation context. In addition to the eminent domain/public project context practice area, Mr. Leifer and his law practice group handle a wide variety of disputes involving adverse impacts to real and business property.
Mr. Leifer and his practice group have consistently achieved outstanding results. During the deepest part of the recession, while financial institutions and government agencies were shutting down, or in crisis, Mr. Leifer and his trial team received a $60,000,000 jury verdict against a city. The matter later settled for over $70 million.
His first condemnation trial, tried with Patrick Hennessey, resulted in the first reported appellate court opinion concerning contaminated property in the Eminent Domain context. Mr. Leifer's jury victories also include what is believed to be the highest pre-condemnation damage verdict in California. Mr. Leifer also represented a business achieving the largest amount of loss of business goodwill in an eminent domain proceeding. Despite the size of the award, the business was not displaced from its location.
In a recent inverse condemnation matter submitted to arbitration, Mr. Leifer obtained an award against Caltrans for more than $3.2 million. Caltrans' position was initially to deny liability and compensable damages.
Mr. Leifer has also successfully challenged the public agencies' right to take in eminent domain cases and has also successfully forced public agencies to change the scope of their takings.
Mr. Leifer has also successfully represented various property owners in challenging land use approvals or denials from various cities and public agencies.
Mr. Leifer also represented the landowner in a land lease adjustment arbitration against the owners of 150 condominium units. A significant arbitration award was issued against the unit owners. Post-arbitration, the unit owners attempted to challenge the arbitration award. Mr. Leifer successfully defeated the challenge to the arbitration award in the Superior Court and Appellate Court.
Mr. Leifer was instrumental in securing favorable reported appellate decisions on behalf of his clients including: Kunec v. Brea Redevelopment Agency (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 51; Abers v. Rohrs (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 1199; and HPT IHG-2 Properties Trust v. City of Anaheim (2015) 243 Cal.App.4th 188.
Awards and Honors
Honors
- Selected To Super Lawyers: 2018 - 2021
Other Sources of Feedback About Michael H. Leifer
Included on the 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers list
Past Lists
- 2025 Southern California Super Lawyers list
- 2024 Southern California Super Lawyers list
- 2023 Southern California Super Lawyers list
- 2022 Southern California Super Lawyers list
- 2021 Southern California Super Lawyers list
- 2020 Southern California Super Lawyers list
- 2019 Southern California Super Lawyers list
- 2018 Southern California Super Lawyers list
Education
-
Legal Education
-
Loyola Law School,
Los Angeles,
California, 1988
J.D.
-
Loyola Law School,
Los Angeles,
California, 1988
-
Non Legal Education
-
University of California,
Los Angeles,
California, 1985
B.A.
Honors: With Honors
-
University of California,
Los Angeles,
California, 1985
Current Employment Position(s)
-
Partner
Classes and Seminars
- Instructor – Krav Maga, Orange County
Representative Cases
-
Kunec v. Brea Redevelopment Agency (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 51
-
Abers v. Rohrs (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 1199
-
HPT IHG-2 Properties Trust v. City of Anaheim (2015) 243 Cal.App.4th 188
Bar Admissions
- California
Other Affiliations
- State Bar of California
- Orange County Bar Association
- Los Angeles County Bar Association
- American Bar Association
- International Right of Way Association, Chapter 67
Contact
3 Park Plaza
Suite 1950
Irvine, CA 92614
Phone: 949-652-2622
Fax: 949-794-0725
Email: Send a message
Disclaimer
Your Profile? Update Now
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.
How do I choose a lawyer?
Consider the following:
- Comfort Level – Are you comfortable telling the lawyer personal information? Does the lawyer seem interested in solving your problem?
- Credentials – How long has the lawyer been in practice? Has the lawyer worked on other cases similar to yours?
- Cost – How are the lawyer's fees structured — hourly or flat fee? Can the lawyer estimate the cost of your case?
- City – Is the lawyer's office conveniently located?
Not sure what questions to ask a lawyer?
Here are a few to get you started:
- How long have you been in practice?
- How many cases like mine have you handled?
- How often do you settle cases out of court?
- What are your fees and costs?
- What are the next steps?
Want to check lawyer discipline?
It is always a good idea to research your lawyer prior to hiring. Every state has a disciplinary organization that monitors attorneys, their licenses, and consumer complaints. By researching lawyer discipline you can:
- Ensure the attorney is currently licensed to practice in your state
- Gain an understanding of his or her historical disciplinary record, if any.
- Determine the seriousness of complaints/issues which could range from late bar fees to more serious issues requiring disciplinary action.