Skip to main content
Viselman, Ross E.

Ross E. Viselman - Los Angeles, CA

Attorney at BD&J, PC

Lawyers in Los Angeles, CA

11175 Santa Monica Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90025

  • Free Consultation

Updated: 09/14/2026

Attorney Information

Overview

Ross E. Viselman concentrates his practice on business litigation. Prior to joining the Firm, he was a trial attorney for the Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., where he gained substantial courtroom experience opposing the United States Attorney's Office. He has conducted over 15 federal trials and over a half-dozen oral arguments before the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. More recently, Mr. Viselman was a civil litigation associate at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP and Liner Yankelevitz Sunshine & Regenstreiff LLP in Los Angeles.

Mr. Viselman obtained his Bachelor of Arts from Brandeis University in 1994 and his Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School in 1999. He is admitted to practice in California and before the U.S. District Court for the Southern and Central Districts of California and the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.


Education

Legal Education

  • Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts
    J.D.

Non Legal Education

  • Brandeis University
    B.A.

Bar Admissions

  • California, 1999

Be the first to write a review!

There are currently no reviews for Ross E. Viselman. Be the first to share your experience.

Write a Review

Photo

Contact

Google Map

Los Angeles, CA

11175 Santa Monica Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90025

Directions

Phone Number: (855) 929-6737

Email: Send a message

Websites:

Hours: 24/7

  • Credit Cards Accepted
  • Free Consultations

Contact BD&J, PC Today

Preferred contact method
DISCLAIMER: By submitting this form you accept the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer

Your Profile?  Update Now

When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.