Enter legal issue and location
Bruce J. Highman - San Francisco, CA
582 MARKET STREETSUITE 1212 San Francisco, CA 94104
The Highman Law Firm
San Francisco Employment Law -- Employee Lawyer
Overview
Bruce J. Highman has been lead counsel on a number of cases that have resulted in published precedent decisions, has participated in numerous trials, and has appeared as a guest lecturer on employment law issues. He is also a member of the National Employment Lawyers Association, the California Employment Lawyers Association, and the Labor and Employment Law Section of the California Lawyers Association.
Mr. Highman received his undergraduate degree from the University of California at Berkeley in 1977 and his law degree from Stanford University Law School in 1981. After graduating from law school, he was selected, and served, as a law clerk to a justice of the Alaska Supreme Court in Juneau, Alaska. He entered private practice in 1982.
About Bruce J. Highman
Current Employment Position(s)
- Attorney
Practice Areas
- Employment Law -- Employee
Representative Cases
- Client v. Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc., 2021 WL 3140718 (U.S. District Court, N.D. California 2021)
- Client v. StoneMor Partners, L.P., 2015 U.S. Dist. Lexis 135472 (U.S. District Court, N.D. California 2015)
- Client v. StoneMor Partners, L.P., 2014 U.S. Dist. Lexis 47021 (U.S. District Court, N.D. California 2014)
- Client v. Contemporary Services Corporation, 2013 Cal.App. Unpub. Lexis 6081 (California State Court of Appeal, 1st District 2013)
- Client v. Gordon Trucking, 2008 WL 4078747 (U.S. District Court, E.D. California 2008)
- Client v. Ikon Office Solutions, 143 F.Supp.2d 1163 (U.S. District Court, N.D. California 2001)
- Client v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. , 230 B.R. 418 (U.S. District Court, N.D. California 1999)
- Client v. Litton Systems, 841 F.Supp. 956 (U.S. District Court, N.D. California 1994)
- Client v. Western Title Insurance Company, 27 Cal.App.4th 925 (California State Court of Appeal, 6th District 1994)
- Client v. Western Title Insurance Company, 230 Cal.App.3d 1223 (California State Court of Appeal, 6th District 1991)
- Client v. Burns International Security Services, 729 F.Supp. 695 (U.S. District Court, N.D. California 1990)
Qualifications
Bar Admissions
- California, 1981
- U.S. District Court Central District of California, 1991
- U.S. District Court Northern District of California, 1983
- U.S. District Court Eastern District of California, 1987
- U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit, 1983
- U.S. Supreme Court, 1988
Other Affiliations
- California Employment Lawyers Association
- National Employment Lawyers Association
- Labor and Employment Law Section of California Lawyers Association
Classes and Seminars
- Guest speaker on employment law topics, National Employment Lawyers Association, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Bar Association of San Francisco, Skyline College
Past Positions
- Alaska Supreme Court, Law Clerk, 1981 - 1982
Education
- Stanford Law School, Stanford, California, June, 1981
J.D. - University of California , Berkeley, California, 1977
A.B., Bachelor of Arts
Honors: cum laude
Major: Geography
Office Information
Address
582 MARKET STREETSUITE 1212 San Francisco, CA 94104
Phone
Fax
- (415) 982-5202
Websites
Achievements
Other Sources of Feedback About Bruce J. Highman
Included on the 2025 Northern California Super Lawyers list
Past Lists
- 2024 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2023 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2022 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2021 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2020 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2019 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2018 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2017 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2016 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2015 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2014 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2013 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2012 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2011 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2010 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2009 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2008 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2007 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2006 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2005 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2004 Northern California Super Lawyers list
Honors
- Selected as Northern California Super Lawyer each year from 2004 through present
- Selected for America's Top 100 High Stakes Litigators for Northern California from 2020 through present
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.
Write Your Review
Fields marked with an * are required
How do I choose a lawyer?
Consider the following:
- Comfort Level
- - Are you comfortable telling the lawyer personal information? Does the lawyer seem interested in solving your problem?
- Credentials
- - How long has the lawyer been in practice? Has the lawyer worked on other cases similar to yours?
- Cost
- - How are the lawyer's fees structured - hourly or flat fee? Can the lawyer estimate the cost of your case?
- City
- - Is the lawyer's office conveniently located?
Not sure what questions to ask a lawyer?
Here are a few to get you started:
- How long have you been in practice?
- How many cases like mine have you handled?
- How often do you settle cases out of court?
- What are your fees and costs?
- What are the next steps?
Want to check lawyer discipline?
It is always a good idea to research your lawyer prior to hiring. Every state has a disciplinary organization that monitors attorneys, their licenses, and consumer complaints. By researching lawyer discipline you can:
- Ensure the attorney is currently licensed to practice in your state
- Gain an understanding of his or her historical disciplinary record, if any.
- Determine the seriousness of complaints/issues which could range from late bar fees to more serious issues requiring disciplinary action.