Search by legal issue and/or location
Enter information in one or both fields. (Required)
Washington Complex Litigation Lawyer
Overview
Robert E. Johnston's practice focuses on trials and appeals of complex litigation matters, with an emphasis on defending pharmaceutical product liability litigation and on prosecuting insurance coverage disputes for corporate clients. In 2015, he was selected by Corporate America Legal Elite for Best in Product Liability Litigation-Washington, DC.
Mr. Johnston has served as co-lead trial counsel in multiple pharmaceutical products liability trials, including Hogan v. Novartis Pharm. Corp., No. 1-06-CV-00260-BMC (E.D.N.Y. 2011), which resulted in a defense verdict for our client. He manages the defense of class action, consolidated, and serial litigations and represents clients in significant individual matters as well. He has developed key liability defenses to sweeping allegations of corporate misconduct, and he has worked with experts and senior company employees to advance those defenses in depositions and at trial. He defends depositions of corporate employees and has been involved in motions disputing the admissibility at trial of videotaped corporate depositions. He prepared eight corporate witnesses to testify at trial in Meng v. Novartis Pharm. Corp., No. MID-L-7670-07-MT (N.J. Super. Ct. Law Div. May 15, 2013) in New Jersey, and in Davids v. Novartis Pharm. Corp., No. 06-CV-431 (E.D.N.Y.2012) in New York federal court (where he served as co-lead trial counsel). Mr. Johnston has developed and presented the testimony of scientific experts and cross-examined plaintiffs’ experts both at deposition and trial. In support of his work developing liability defenses, he is co-leader of the Firm’s e-Discovery group. He has experience implementing court-approved document review strategies and stays current on developments regarding Technology Assisted Review and other emerging document review protocols. He has supervised productions numbering in the tens of millions of pages of documents and regularly counsels clients regarding e-Discovery issues. He is a member of The Sedona Conference.
Mr. Johnston has successfully defended class action claims and handled the nationwide defense of matters coordinated in one of the longest-standing multidistrict litigations in the United States, In re Aredia® and Zometa® Products Liability Litigation. He has written and spoken on the defense of class action claims and spoken on issues regarding the defense of claims in multidistrict litigation.
Mr. Johnston has prevailed on summary judgment in numerous cases, including cases from the Aredia®/Zometa® litigation involving issues of warnings (proximate) causation, the inapplicability of cross-jurisdictional class-action tolling, the applicability of punitive damages limitations, and other topics of interest to medical products liability defense. He has participated in appeals of trial verdicts and summary judgments, including oral argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Mr. Johnston represents clients in both state and federal courts in actions seeking insurance coverage for environmental liabilities, asbestos-related claims, defamation, errors and omissions by insurance agents, and various other business torts. As co-leader of the Firm’s insurance coverage practice, he recently obtained a significant recovery for insulation-installer Porter Hayden Company in its decade-long litigation with AIG over asbestos-related bodily injury claims. He also consults with clients regarding the pursuit of insurance proceeds under solvent and insolvent schemes of arrangement. He has written and spoken on numerous issues relevant to insurance coverage, including issues of fidelity insurance and specialty coverages available for e-commerce enterprises.
Mr. Johnston has pursued litigation in connection with government contracts, including procurement-related claims, Winstar-related claims, and claims for the taking of property by the government without just compensation. He assisted nuclear power utilities in a successful trial before the Court of Federal Claims regarding the federal government’s breach of its contractual obligations to begin removing spent nuclear fuel from power plants by 1998. He has significant experience representing clients in commercial business disputes, including suits arising out of the telecommunications and e-commerce industries. He has written and spoken on issues related to the federal False Claims Act, particularly its qui tam provisions.
Mr. Johnston is a member of the National Association of Railroad Trial Counsel (NARTC) and, in June 2015, served on the faculty at NARTC’s College of Railroad Trial advocacy – an intensive six-day trial techniques course for thirty young trial attorneys. At NARTC's Winter Meeting in 2014, he spoke on the impact of no-recourse litigation funding for plaintiffs and their counsel.
For 2019, Mr. Johnston is once gain named in the Washington, DC edition of Super Lawyers, and is recognized as a 2019 AV Preeminent® Lawyer by Martindale-Hubbell™. He is a member of the Defense Research Institute. In law school, he served as a member of The George Washington Law Review, where his note on qui tam issues was published.
About Robert E. Johnston
Current Employment Position(s)
- Partner
Practice Areas
- Complex Litigation
- Common Carrier Liability
- E-Discovery
- Federal Claims
- Financial Institutions
- Insurance
- Pharmaceutical Products
- Toxic Torts & Products Liability
Qualifications
Bar Admissions
- District of Columbia
- Maryland
- Montana
- U.S. Court of Appeals 2nd Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals 4th Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals 6th Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals 11th Circuit
- U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia
- U.S. District Court District of Maryland
- U.S. District Court District of Montana
- U.S. Court of Federal Claims
Other Affiliations
- Litigation Counsel of America (Fellow)
- National Association of Railroad Trial Counsel
Education
- George Washington University Law School, Washington, District of Columbia, 1994
J.D.
Honors: With High Honors
Honors: Order of the Coif - Southern Methodist University, 1991
B.A. - Southern Methodist University, 1991
B.B.A.
Office Information
Address
1350 I Street, Northwest Washington, DC 20005
Phone
Fax
- (202) 682-1639
Websites
Achievements
Other Sources of Feedback About Robert E. Johnston
Included on the 2025 Washington DC Super Lawyers list
Past Lists
- 2024 Washington DC Super Lawyers list
- 2023 Washington DC Super Lawyers list
- 2022 Washington DC Super Lawyers list
- 2021 Washington DC Super Lawyers list
- 2020 Washington DC Super Lawyers list
- 2019 Washington DC Super Lawyers list
- 2018 Washington DC Super Lawyers list
- 2017 Washington DC Super Lawyers list
- 2014 Washington DC Super Lawyers list
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.
Write Your Review
Fields marked with an * are required
How do I choose a lawyer?
Consider the following:
- Comfort Level
- - Are you comfortable telling the lawyer personal information? Does the lawyer seem interested in solving your problem?
- Credentials
- - How long has the lawyer been in practice? Has the lawyer worked on other cases similar to yours?
- Cost
- - How are the lawyer's fees structured - hourly or flat fee? Can the lawyer estimate the cost of your case?
- City
- - Is the lawyer's office conveniently located?
Not sure what questions to ask a lawyer?
Here are a few to get you started:
- How long have you been in practice?
- How many cases like mine have you handled?
- How often do you settle cases out of court?
- What are your fees and costs?
- What are the next steps?
Want to check lawyer discipline?
It is always a good idea to research your lawyer prior to hiring. Every state has a disciplinary organization that monitors attorneys, their licenses, and consumer complaints. By researching lawyer discipline you can:
- Ensure the attorney is currently licensed to practice in your state
- Gain an understanding of his or her historical disciplinary record, if any.
- Determine the seriousness of complaints/issues which could range from late bar fees to more serious issues requiring disciplinary action.