Russell S. Kato - Honolulu, HI
Attorney at Goodsill Anderson Quinn & Stifel A Limited Liability Law Partnership LLP
Real Estate Development Lawyers in Honolulu, HI
999 Bishop Street Suite 1600 Honolulu, HI 96813
Honolulu Real Estate Development Lawyer
Updated: 03/02/2026
Areas of Practice
- Real Estate Development
- Real Estate Transactions
- Entitlements and Permitting
- Energy and Telecommunications
- Hawaii Business Organizations, Contracts, and Transactions
Attorney Information
Overview
Russell's practice focuses on real estate and business law. He has counseled clients in commercial transactions as well as in resolutions of disputes.
He has previous practice and experience with the Hawai‘i Department of the Attorney General and is familiar with legal and other issues involved with doing business with the State of Hawai‘i.
OUTSIDE THE OFFICE
Russell graduated from Stanford University and received his law degree from the University of California at Davis.
Awards and Honors
Honors
- The Best Lawyers in America, 2020
Education
-
Legal Education
-
University of California, Davis School of Law,
Davis,
California, 1979
J.D.
-
University of California, Davis School of Law,
Davis,
California, 1979
-
Non Legal Education
-
Stanford University,
Palo Alto,
California, 1976
B.A.
-
Stanford University,
Palo Alto,
California, 1976
Current Employment Position(s)
-
Partner
Past Positions
- State of Hawaii, Deputy Attorney General, 1980 - 1982
Bar Admissions
- U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit
- Hawaii, 1979
- U.S. District Court District of Hawaii
Other Affiliations
- Hawaii State Bar Association (Member)
Photo
Contact
999 Bishop Street
Suite 1600
Honolulu, HI 96813
Phone: 808-547-5600
Fax: (808) 547-5880
Email: Send a message
Website: https://www.goodsill.com
Disclaimer
Your Profile? Update Now
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.