Josh Engquist - Chicago, IL
Attorney at The Sotos Law Firm, P.C.
Civil Rights Defense Lawyers in Chicago, IL
141 W. Jackson Blvd. #1240A Chicago, IL 60604
Chicago Civil Rights Defense Lawyer
Updated: 03/26/2026
Areas of Practice
- Civil Rights Defense
- Municipal Defense
Litigation: 100%
Attorney Information
Overview
Josh received his undergraduate degree from Indiana University in 1992 and his law degree from Loyola University Chicago in 1997. For the last 27 years, Josh has focused his practice on the defense of municipalities and their police officers in civil litigation involving allegations of excessive force, wrongful death, malicious prosecution and wrongful conviction. For the first 23 of those years, Josh defended the City of Chicago and its officers as an Assistant Corporation Counsel, including as a City’s Chief Assistant Corporation Counsel. While at the City, Josh was responsible for all aspects of litigation in both state and federal court including discovery, trial, and settlement.
Josh has tried roughly 20 cases to verdict including six wrongful death cases, and several others arising from excessive force, police shootings, malicious prosecution, false arrest, failure to provide medical attention, and reversed conviction.
Education
-
Legal Education
-
Loyola University Chicago School of Law,
Chicago,
Illinois, 1997
J.D.
-
Loyola University Chicago School of Law,
Chicago,
Illinois, 1997
-
Non Legal Education
-
Indiana University,
Bloomington,
Indiana, 1992
B.A.
Major: Political Science
-
Indiana University,
Bloomington,
Indiana, 1992
Current Employment Position(s)
-
Shareholder
Representative Cases
-
Rodriguez v. City of Chicago, et al,: Federal jury trial in front of Judge Kennelly alleging wrongful conviction stemming from the plaintiff’s vacated 1998 murder conviction. Plaintiff claimed that defendants withheld exculpatory evidence (Brady violation) by pressuring an eyewitness during a photo line-up and an in-person line-up. Plaintiff demanded $14,200,000 at trial and the jury returned a verdict for the defendants.
-
Scirocco Giles v. City of Chicago, et al.,: Federal jury trial in front of Judge Coleman alleging excessive force
- Citation: battery, malicious prosecution, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and a Monell claim for failing to properly investigate police-involved shooting cases. The case stemmed from the shooting of plaintiff while he fled officers after a traffic stop. Plaintiff was armed with a handgun and shot in the back, severing his spine and causing paralysis below the waist. Plaintiff claimed he never turned toward the officer behind to him to justify being shot, however, the physical evidence (the bullet path) supported the officer’s version of events. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants.
-
Nikita Bailey v. City of Chicago, et. al.,: State court jury trial in front of Judge James Flannery, Jr. arising out of a May 3, 2006 traffic stop in which decedent attempted to flee in his vehicle and during that process dragged the defendant officer. Plaintiff—as administrator of the estate of the decedent—brought intentional battery claims under the wrongful death and survival acts, and a spoliation claim. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants.
-
Common / Smith v. City of Chicago, et al.,: Federal jury trial in front of Judge Kennelly. Plaintiff alleged unreasonable use of deadly force and supplemental state law wrongful death and survival claims against Chicago Police Officers and the City of Chicago stemming from a 2006 police shooting in which Michael Smith died after being shot in the chest while attempting to disarm a police officer. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants.
Bar Admissions
- Illinois, 1997
- U.S. District Court Northern District of Illinois, 1997
- U.S. Federal Courts
Other Affiliations
- Member of Trial Bar of the Northern District of Illinois
Fraternities and Sororities
- Alpha Sigma Phi
Contact
141 W. Jackson Blvd. #1240A
Chicago, IL 60604
Phone: 630-735-3303
Fax: 630-773-0980
Email: Send a message
Website: https://www.jsotoslaw.com
Disclaimer
Your Profile? Update Now
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.
How do I choose a lawyer?
Consider the following:
- Comfort Level – Are you comfortable telling the lawyer personal information? Does the lawyer seem interested in solving your problem?
- Credentials – How long has the lawyer been in practice? Has the lawyer worked on other cases similar to yours?
- Cost – How are the lawyer's fees structured — hourly or flat fee? Can the lawyer estimate the cost of your case?
- City – Is the lawyer's office conveniently located?
Not sure what questions to ask a lawyer?
Here are a few to get you started:
- How long have you been in practice?
- How many cases like mine have you handled?
- How often do you settle cases out of court?
- What are your fees and costs?
- What are the next steps?
Want to check lawyer discipline?
It is always a good idea to research your lawyer prior to hiring. Every state has a disciplinary organization that monitors attorneys, their licenses, and consumer complaints. By researching lawyer discipline you can:
- Ensure the attorney is currently licensed to practice in your state
- Gain an understanding of his or her historical disciplinary record, if any.
- Determine the seriousness of complaints/issues which could range from late bar fees to more serious issues requiring disciplinary action.