Andrew R. Pynn - St. Charles, MO
Attorney at Boehmer Law
Criminal Law Lawyers in St. Charles, MO
1603 Boones Lick Road St. Charles, MO 63301
- Free Consultation
- 1 Super Lawyers®
-
6
Years
Experience
St. Charles Criminal Law Lawyer
Updated: 09/24/2026
Areas of Practice
- Criminal Law
- Personal Injury
- Civil Litigation
- Family and Divorce Law
Litigation: 60%
Attorney Information
Overview
Prior to joining the firm in 2022, Andrew Roth Pynn attended Syracuse University College of Law, where he proudly graduated in 2018. Andrew is a compassionate attorney dedicated to guiding his clients through the intricacies of family law with empathy, expertise, and professionalism. Andrew specializes in providing personalized solutions to each and every client’s set of unique circumstances, specifically the issues that naturally arise from divorce, child custody, child support, and spousal support.
In his spare time, Andrew enjoys rooting for Syracuse Men’s Basketball and the Chicago Bears, and spending time with his wife and two dogs.
Awards and Honors
Other Sources of Feedback About Andrew R. Pynn
Included on the 2026 Missouri and Kansas Super Lawyers list
Past Lists
- 2025 Missouri and Kansas Super Lawyers list
- 2024 Missouri and Kansas Super Lawyers list
Education
Legal Education
-
Syracuse University College of Law,
Syracuse,
New York, 2018
J.D.
Non Legal Education
-
Indiana State University,
Terre Haute,
Indiana, 2015
B.S., Bachelor of Science
Major: Political Science
Minor: Public Affairs and Legal Studies
Current Employment Position(s)
-
Associate Attorney
Bar Admissions
- Missouri, 2021
- Minnesota, 2020
Photo
Contact
1603 Boones Lick Road
St. Charles, MO 63301
Phone Number: 636-549-8300
Email: Send a message
Hours: Mon - Fri: 8:00 am - 6:00 pm and Sat - Sun: Appointment Only
Disclaimer
Your Profile? Update Now
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.