Matthew G. Jubelt - Syracuse, NY
Attorney at Newman & Lickstein, LLP
Litigation Lawyers in Syracuse, NY
109 S Warren St Suite 404 Syracuse, NY 13202
Syracuse Litigation Lawyer
Updated: 03/02/2026
Areas of Practice
- Litigation
- Disputes
Attorney Information
Overview
Matthew G. Jubelt, is Of Counsel at Newman & Lickstein, practicing commercial and business litigation. Matthew’s trial experience includes years as both a federal prosecutor and defense counsel advocating in both bench and jury trials in cases of both white-collar financial and violent crimes. Matthew’s influence in the courtroom extends beyond his immediate casework. His pre-trial motions practice in the trial of United States v. Wolpert, was affirmed after interlocutory appeal, and was recognized by military law practitioners as a catalyst for statutory changes to personal jurisdiction under Article Two of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Education
-
Legal Education
-
Syracuse University College of Law,
Syracuse,
New York, 2009
J.D.
-
Syracuse University College of Law,
Syracuse,
New York, 2009
-
Non Legal Education
-
Syracuse University Maxwell School of Citizenship & Public Affairs, 2009
M.P.A. -
Syracuse University, 2009
Certificate of Advance Study in Security Studies -
University of Vermont, 2006
B.A.
Major: History & Political Science
Minor: Middle Eastern Studies
-
Syracuse University Maxwell School of Citizenship & Public Affairs, 2009
Current Employment Position(s)
-
Of Counsel
Bar Admissions
- New York
- Georgia
- U.S. District Court Northern District of New York
- U.S. Supreme Court
- U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Photo
Contact
109 S Warren St
Suite 404
Syracuse, NY 13202
Phone: 315-627-6948
Email: Send a message
Website: https://www.newmanlickstein.com/
Disclaimer
Your Profile? Update Now
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.