Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Chapman, Dowling & Mallek

Chapman, Dowling & Mallek - Charlotte, NC

White Collar Crimes Lawyers in Charlotte, NC

6201 Fairview Rd, Ste 200A Charlotte, NC 28210

  • Free Consultation

Charlotte White Collar Crimes Law Firm

Updated: 07/14/2026

Areas of Practice

  • White Collar Crimes 51%
  • Health Care Fraud Defense 29%
  • Federal Criminal Defense 20%

Firm Information

Overview

At Chapman, Dowling & Mallek, we focus exclusively on high-stakes federal and white collar defense, guiding professionals and corporations through complex investigations, indictments and trials. From our office in Detroit, Michigan, our practice spans critical areas, including healthcare fraud, financial crimes and cybercrimes defense. By intervening early in sensitive federal inquiries, we aggressively protect our clients against allegations of tax evasion, embezzlement and corporate misconduct before they devastate their livelihood.

Our distinct advantage lies in our deep insight into federal agency procedures and prosecutorial tactics. Whether you face a digital fraud investigation or a complex corporate false claims case, we build robust defense strategies tailored to the highest stakes. We understand how federal prosecutors build their cases, allowing us to anticipate their moves and effectively defend your assets, liberty and professional reputation.

Our top-notch defense begins with absolute privacy and strategic discretion. Trusted by business leaders, healthcare executives and financial professionals, we protect your career and reputation through selective engagement and controlled information flow. By combining decades of creative legal leverage with advanced data analytics, we act quickly to shape the narrative before federal investigators decide it for you. We dissect the government’s evidence to reveal critical flaws, securing quiet, decisive victories.

Our proven record at Chapman, Dowling & Mallek includes 188 acquittals alongside countless dismissals and favorable resolutions in high-stakes federal trials. We understand the gravity of these investigations, which is why we offer free initial consultations to evaluate your case immediately. To accommodate your schedule and ensure accessible counsel when the stakes are highest, our firm provides flexible virtual appointments and conveniently accepts credit cards. Contact us today to put our precise, data-backed defense strategy to work for you.


Representative Clients

  • United States v. S. K. - Court dismissed most counts in superseding indictment pre‑trial; “sex‑act” counts and over‑aggregated FDA counts tossed; limited FDA/fraud counts remained.
  • United States v. K. H. - Jury acquitted 6 distribution counts; hung on 2; prosecution later dismissed remaining count
  • United States v. L. K. - Jury acquitted 6 distribution counts; hung on 2; prosecution later dismissed remaining count
  • United States v. T. H. - Mid‑trial Rule 29 relief on two “resulting‑in‑death” counts; remainder resolved with time served and return of seized assets.
  • United States v. R. V. - Pre‑trial diversion with restitution; no conviction entered.
  • United States v. N. - Conviction vacated post‑Ruan for reconsideration of mens rea under CSA §841.
  • United States v. R. B. - Jury acquitted Dr. B. and 3 co‑defendants of all counts in a $464M HCF/opioid case.
  • United States v. L. P. - Jury found not guilty on 38 counts after month‑long trial; DOJ later reflected the acquittal.
  • United States v. A. J. - After 8–9 day trial, jury found both physicians not guilty of all charged counts.
  • United States v. W. M. Jury acquitted 2 distribution counts and hung on conspiracy; convicted on 4 other counts.
  • United States v. P. S. Initially charged with opioid distribution; resolved by plea to misdemeanor false entry in a medical record.
  • United States v. F. C. - Pre‑trial diversion; motion to dismiss filed; restitution + supervision; no conviction.
  • United States v. J. O. - Month‑long “pill‑mill” trial; jury returned not‑guilty on all counts; assets later returned.
  • United States v. Q. - Felony opioid charges resolved by plea to misdemeanor false entry in a medical record.
  • United States v. E. H. - Five individuals, acquitted after trial; corporate entities convicted.

Be the first to write a review!

There are currently no reviews for Chapman, Dowling & Mallek. Be the first to share your experience.

Write a Review

Staff

  • Madelyn Tribu, Paralegal
  • Cheyanne Oneal, Paralegal
  • Laurie Oestreich, CEO

Staff

  • Madelyn Tribu, Paralegal
  • Cheyanne Oneal, Paralegal
  • Laurie Oestreich, CEO

Contact

Google Map

Charlotte, NC

6201 Fairview Rd, Ste 200A
Charlotte, NC 28210

Directions

Phone Number: 346-781-1794

Email: Send a message

Website: https://whitecollarcriminaldefense.com/

  • Credit Cards Accepted
  • Free Consultations
  • Virtual Appointments

Michigan Locations

Charlotte, MI  (4.8 miles)

101 N McDowell St, Ste 200A
Charlotte, MI 28204

Directions

Phone Number: 346-781-1794

Email: Send a message

Website: https://whitecollarcriminaldefense.com/

  • Credit Cards Accepted
  • Free Consultations
  • Virtual Appointments

Detroit, MI  (Main Office, 513 miles)

456 E Milwaukee St
Detroit, MI 48202

Directions

Phone Number: 346-781-1794

Email: Send a message

Website: https://whitecollarcriminaldefense.com/

Hours: Monday – Friday: 8:30 am – 6 pm; Appointments: Weekday

  • Credit Cards Accepted
  • Free Consultations
  • Virtual Appointments

District of Columbia Locations

Washington, DC  (333.2 miles)

1629 K Street NW
Suite 300
Washington, DC 20006

Directions

Phone Number: 346-781-1794

Email: Send a message

Website: https://whitecollarcriminaldefense.com/

Hours: Monday – Friday: 8:30 am - 6 pm; Appointments: Weekday

  • Credit Cards Accepted
  • Free Consultations
  • Virtual Appointments

Contact Us Today

Preferred contact method
DISCLAIMER: By submitting this form you accept the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer

Your Profile?  Update Now

When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.