Pete Heidepriem - Sioux Falls, SD
Attorney at Heidepriem, Purtell, Siegel & Hinrichs, LLP
Personal Injury Lawyers in Sioux Falls, SD
101 West 69th Street Suite 105A Sioux Falls, SD 57108
- Free Consultation
Sioux Falls Personal Injury Lawyer
Updated: 03/10/2026
Reviews
Customer Reviews for Pete Heidepriem
Highlights
-
5.0 Value
-
5.0 Quality of Service
-
5.0 Professional Competence
Read reviews that mention:
-
Verified ClientHired Attorney 2024-2026We connected with Pete through a recommendation from another attorney. That alone should tell you something. Additionally, I can say that without doubt the outcome would have been different had Pete not been the excellent attorney and advocate that he is. That also extends to the team he has around him. He understood where we were in our own process and came along side us. He answered questions we had. He helped educate us to the landscape and reality of our situation. He didn’t tell us what to do, he informed us and provided what we needed so that we could move forward confident that regardless of the outcome, we had done so to the best of our ability. We would never have arrived where we did without Pete and his team.
-
Verified ClientHired Attorney 2024-2025I was involved in an automobile accident back on February 11th 2024 which started me on my crazy experience with insurance companies. This was my first time having to deal with anything like this and I was totally unprepared to cope with the chaos. On a recommendation I met with Pete and all I can say is, "Man did I get an education" on what to do and what not to do! He explained things in such relatable terms and how by doing things a certain it would be better for me in the long term. I had not planned to do anything at this first meeting but by the time it was done I knew signing on and having Pete and his team, (Grace, she was amazing) take over was the only option for me. They handled it all and their communication was excellent. Even as things dragged on and on, they always listened to and answered any concerns I had. Just the peace of mind made my experience with it all. I highly recommend Pete and his firm to anyone how needs help with this kind of situation. Oh, and all the staff there even ones you're not directly dealing with are the best! (Deb you know I'm talking about you) along with everyone else. A HUGE thank you to Pete and Grace for taking such good care of me!
-
Verified ClientHired Attorney 2025Pete is awesome!! I had a contract issues and his expert knowledge on how contracts are written and my situation was resolved quickly and painless. I highly recommend Pete.
-
Verified ClientHired Attorney 2024Pete solved my legal problems quickly and efficiently. I could not have hoped for a better result. So thankful for all that he was able to help me with!
Areas of Practice
- Personal Injury
- American Indian Law
- Civil Rights
- Appeals
Attorney Information
Overview
Pete is a trial lawyer practicing in the federal, tribal, and state courts of South Dakota. His personal injury work ranges from farm and ranch injuries to car accidents. Pete also represents people vindicating their civil rights in claims based on racial discrimination or other constitutional violations. He has a track record of representing clients in personal injury cases where they achieve significant results:
- $2.5 million—workplace injury, loss of leg
- $2.1 million—car crash, wrongful death of two individuals
- $1.6 million—ATV rollover crash
- $1.25 million—car crash, wrongful death
- $1.1 million—wrongful death in farm accident
- $1 million—medical negligence, failure to diagnose disease
Pete’s appellate experience covers state and federal courts. In front of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, he argued on behalf of a driver in a traffic stop who claimed his constitutional rights were violated—the result was a unanimous decision in his client’s favor. He has appealed fraud and probate claims to the Supreme Court of South Dakota, achieving a unanimous decision for his client. Before the U.S. Supreme Court, he filed an amicus brief regarding tribal sovereignty on behalf of American Indian tribes, and the Court ruled unanimously in favor of the party supported in the brief.
Pete is passionate about advocacy that supports tribal governments and communities. From 2023 to 2024, the Crow Creek Sioux Tribe named him General Counsel. In that role, Pete served as the chief legal advisor to the Tribal Council and provided legal advice to all levels of the tribal government and members of the Tribe. During 2020 to 2021, Pete served as a tribal prosecutor for the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, where he was lead counsel in a court trial and managed complex prosecutions involving violent crimes and drug offenses. He also has served as counsel to a tribal judge of the Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate.
In addition to private practice, Pete maintains a focus on academic work. Since 2022, he has served as an adjunct professor of law at the University of South Dakota Knudson School of Law, teaching a seminar on appellate advocacy and federal Indian law. During fall 2021, he was a Joachim Herz Fellow and visiting scholar at Bucerius Law School in Germany, where he conducted research on international investment law and the rights of Indigenous peoples. Bucerius featured Pete in an article about his fellowship, and you can access it here.
Education
Legal Education
-
Georgetown University Law Center,
Washington,
District of Columbia, 2016
J.D.
Honors: Dean's List, Moot court, Graduation commencement speaker, Georgetown Immigration Law Journal -
Bucerius Law School,
Hamburg,
Germany, 2015
International and comparative business law
Non Legal Education
-
Arizona State University,
Tempe,
Arizona, 2013
B.A.
Honors: magna cum laude
Honors: Phi Beta Kappa
Major: Philosophy and Political Science -
London School of Economics,
London,
United Kingdom, 2011
Economics and political theory
Current Employment Position(s)
-
Partner
Past Positions
- Environment and Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Appellate section intern
- Chambers of Judge Tanya S. Chutkan of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Judicial intern
- South Dakota U.S. Attorney’s Office, Legal intern
- Chambers of Chief Judge Jeffrey L. Viken of the U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota, Law clerk
- Chambers of Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan of the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island, Law clerk
Published Works
Articles
-
Indigenous Rights, Investor-State Disputes, and Canadian Law, S.D. L. Rev. (2023)
-
Recalibrate Revocations of Supervised Release, 51 U. Balt. L. Rev. 329 (2022)
•Cited in the Yale Law Journal -
Tribal Remedies, Exhaustion, and State Courts, 44 Am. Indian L. Rev. 241 (2020) •Cited in the first ever Restatement of the Law of American Indians, section 59 of Chapter 4 on Tribal Economic Development
•Chosen as one of the “Selected Law Review Articles” in the American Indian Law Deskbook 2021 Edition by the Conference of Western Attorneys General •Cited in an American Law Reports annotation on the tribal exhaustion doctrine requirement, 72 A.L.R -
Fresh Fears of Deportation for Cubans in the U.S., 29 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 305 (2015)
• Cited in the Suffolk University Law Review -
The Tohono O’odham Nation and the United States-Mexico Border, 4 Am. Indian L.J. 107 (2015)
• Cited by the court in M.F. v. V.S., 2023 WL 1196627, *15 n.9 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 31, 2023) • Cited in the California Law Review and American Indian Law Review
Bar Admissions
- South Dakota, 2016
- U.S. District Court District of South Dakota, 2016
- Lower Brule Sioux Tribal Court, 2020
- U.S. Supreme Court, 2020
- U.S. Court of Appeals 8th Circuit, 2022
Photo
Contact
101 West 69th Street
Suite 105A
Sioux Falls, SD 57108
Phone Number: 605-252-9277
Fax Number: 605-679-4379
Email: Send a message
Hours: M-F: 8am – 5pm
Disclaimer
Your Profile? Update Now
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.