Rachel Deanna Sharp - Nashville, TN
Attorney at Miller Upshaw Family Law, PLLC
Divorce Lawyers in Nashville, TN
631 Woodland St Nashville, TN 37206 - 4211
- 1 Super Lawyers®
-
20
Years
Experience
Nashville Divorce Lawyer
Updated: 03/10/2026
Areas of Practice
- Divorce
- Child Custody
- Child Support
- Post-Divorce Actions
- Wills & Probate
- Civil Litigation
- Guardianships & Conservatorships
Litigation: 80%
Attorney Information
Awards and Honors
Other Sources of Feedback About Rachel Deanna Sharp
Included on the 2025 Mid-South Super Lawyers list
Past Lists
- 2024 Mid-South Super Lawyers list
- 2023 Mid-South Super Lawyers list
- 2022 Mid-South Super Lawyers list
- 2021 Mid-South Super Lawyers list
- 2020 Mid-South Super Lawyers list
- 2019 Mid-South Super Lawyers list
- 2016 Mid-South Super Lawyers list
- 2015 Mid-South Super Lawyers list
- 2014 Mid-South Super Lawyers list
Education
-
Legal Education
-
Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law,
Memphis,
Tennessee, 2006
J.D.
Honors: With Distinction
Law Review: University of Memphis Law Review, 2004 - 2006
-
Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law,
Memphis,
Tennessee, 2006
-
Non Legal Education
-
Middle Tennessee State University,
Murfreesboro,
Tennessee, 2002
B.A.
Honors: cum laude
Major: Political Science
-
Middle Tennessee State University,
Murfreesboro,
Tennessee, 2002
Current Employment Position(s)
-
Associate
Past Positions
- DuBois, DuBois & Bates, PC, Associate Attorney, 2006 - 2008
- Judge Karen R. Williams, Law Clerk, 2005 - 2006
Bar Admissions
- Tennessee, 2006
Other Affiliations
- Tennessee Bar Association, 2006 - 2008 (Member)
Fraternities and Sororities
- Alpha Delta Pi
Photo
Contact
631 Woodland St
Nashville, TN 37206 - 4211
Phone: 615-391-4200
Fax: 615-885-8849
Email: Send a message
Website: https://www.nashvillefamilylaw.com
Disclaimer
Your Profile? Update Now
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.