David Thomas - Austin, TX
Attorney at Stephen T Bowling, DWI & Criminal Defense Attorneys
Driving While Intoxicated Lawyers in Austin, TX
816 Congress Ave Suite 950 Austin, TX 78701
- Free Consultation
Austin Driving While Intoxicated Lawyer
Updated: 03/10/2026
Areas of Practice
- Driving While Intoxicated
- Drug Possession
- Possession of Marijuana
- Assault
- Theft
- Misdemeanor Charges
- Felony Charges
- Criminal Defense
Attorney Information
Education
-
Legal Education
-
St. Mary's University School of Law,
San Antonio,
Texas
J.D.
Honors: Excellence Award for Outstanding Editing and Writing
Honors: Recipient of the Charles A. Beckham Jr. Scholarship
Honors: Recipient of the St. Mary’s Law School Pro Bono Certificate
Law Journal: St. Mary’s Law Journal, Senior Associate Editor
-
St. Mary's University School of Law,
San Antonio,
Texas
-
Non Legal Education
-
Florida State University, May, 2004
B.S., Bachelor of Science
Major: Business Management with emphasis on Finance
-
Florida State University, May, 2004
Current Employment Position(s)
-
Managing Partner
Past Positions
- United States Navy
- Professor Judith Gray, Teaching Assistant
- Professor Colin Marks, Research Assistant
- Judge Julie Kocurek, 390thDistrict Court Trial Team, Intern
- Law Office of Chad Van Brunt
- Law Office of KG
Pro Bono Activities
- National College for DUI Defense
- Stephen M. Sheppard, the Dean of the St. Mary’s University School of Law, Research Fellow
Bar Admissions
- Texas
Other Affiliations
- Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association
- Austin Bar Association
- American Association of Justice
Fraternities and Sororities
- Phi Delta Phi
Photo
Contact
816 Congress Ave
Suite 950
Austin, TX 78701
Phone: 512-893-6928
Email: Send a message
Website: https://www.dwiman.com/
Disclaimer
Your Profile? Update Now
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.