Cathleen S. Huang - Walnut Creek, CA
Attorney at Bowles & Verna LLP
Business & Commercial Litigation (International) Lawyers in Walnut Creek, CA
2121 North California Boulevard Suite 875 Walnut Creek, CA 94596
- Free Consultation
- 1 Super Lawyers®
-
28
Years
Experience
Walnut Creek Business & Commercial Litigation (International) Lawyer
Updated: 09/10/2026
Areas of Practice
- Business & Commercial Litigation (International) 50%
- Products Liability 40%
Litigation: 100%
Attorney Information
Overview
Commanding native fluency of Mandarin Chinese, Cathleen Huang is international and national counsel to numerous product manufacturers, distributors, trading companies, and online retailers based in Taiwan, China, Hong Kong, and the U.S. from all industries, including consumer electronics and gas appliances, solar modules/wafers, consumer appliances, lighting, computer components, hand tools, gas cylinders, luggage, bicycles, food supplements, glass containers, and medical devices, etc.
She visits manufacturing facilities in Asia and meets with company executives, personnel, and engineers to learn the business and the design, testing, manufacturing, quality control procedures to become knowledgeable about the clients’ operations and help to identify and mitigate potential risks.
She counsels her clients throughout the product lifecycle, from product research and development, to evaluation of packaging and marketing materials and manuals, product regulatory compliance, corporate formation and litigation. She commands over 20 years of litigation experience and her areas of practice include the following:
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL LITIGATION/ARBITRATION
- Breach of contracts/warranties
- Breach of fiduciary duties as to corporate officers, board of directors and majority stockholders
- International trade compliance
PRODUCT SAFETY/LIABILITY
- Product liability claims/litigation
- Global product recalls
- Federal and state regulatory compliance:
- Consumer Product Safety Commission/ Health Canada/Profeco reporting
- Proposition 65 warnings compliance (successful dismissal of Prop 65 cases based on various defenses)
- Model Toxics in Packaging Legislation
- Country of origin claims
- California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA)
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reporting and recalls
CLASS ACTION DEFENSE
- False advertisement/consumer fraud/unfair business practice
- Breach of warranties
- Country of origin
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISPUTES
- Patent infringement prosecution/defense
- Trademark infringement/Trade dress prosecution/defense
- Misappropriation of trade secrets
Notable Achievements
- Obtained a seven-figure international arbitration award on behalf of minority shareholders involving foreign investment in a U.S. online travel technology company. We asserted breach of fiduciary duties and intentional tort claims against the majority shareholder (a major multinational Chinese conglomerate in the airline industry), as well as the board members and officers appointed by the Chinese conglomerate to the U.S. online startup company.
- Favorable settlement on behalf of the largest Chinese solar manufacturer in Northern China defending an alleged breach of international supply contract valued at more than $400 million. Defended depositions of Chinese-speaking executives in Hong Kong.
- Dismissal of multi-million commercial dispute matter based on lack of personal jurisdiction.
- Favorable settlement on behalf of the largest solar manufacturer in Taiwan in an alleged breach of an international supply agreement valued at more than $730 million.
- Obtained temporary restraining order prohibiting the dispersal of $100 million in proceeds from the sale of a Chinese company that constructed and managed water treatment facilities. After the TRO, the parties entered into a resolution. Subsequent litigation ensued against domestic and foreign individuals and entities, where additional TROs were issued as well as a preliminary injunction.
- Conducted multiple product recalls in U.S., Canada, and Mexico on behalf of overseas manufacturers of various consumer appliances.
- Dismissal of a $15 million products liability case based on repeated acts of perjury by the plaintiffs. See Englebrick v. Worthington 944 F. Supp. 899 (2013).
- Obtained a defense verdict on behalf of Kwang Yang Motor Company (KYMCO) after 3 week trial on a product liability case involving a ATV accident.
- Obtained a $3.5 million settlement on behalf of a U.S. national distributor of nutritional supplements against a Japanese public company in a breach of contract action.
- Obtained a $2.4 million settlement on behalf of a U.S. software company against a British public company in a breach of contract action.
- Successfully defended one of the largest glass manufacturers in the world in a $10 million breach of contract action.
- Obtained summary judgment in a product liability action alleging that a defective flammable gas cylinder caused severe burns. The court granted the defense motion to preclude Plaintiffs’ experts from testifying on the grounds the expert opinions were not scientific or reliable. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling.
- Successful defense of a Taiwanese manufacturer of power supply against patent infringement claim and negotiated a lucrative license agreement on behalf of the same company.
- Successful defense of a Taiwanese manufacturer of bicycle forks against $10 million breach of contract claim.
Speaking Engagements
- April 13, 2006, Taipei International Sporting Goods Show (TaiSPO), Taipei, Taiwan. Topic: U.S. Product Liability Law and Consumer Product Safety Commission.
- May 10, 2006, National Hardware Show, Las Vegas, Nevada. Topic: IP, CPSC and Products Liability Issues for Foreign Manufacturers.
- May 21, 2007, A moderator at the first annual International Consumer Product Safety Symposium at Beijing, China, which was co-sponsored by the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ) of the Peoples’ Republic of China and the International Consumer Product Safety and Health Organization.
- October 2007 Separate Presentations to the Neihu Business Association, Taipei, Taiwan; Taichung Industrial Park, Taichung, Taiwan. Topic: Effective Strategies for Preventing Lawsuits for Companies Selling Goods to the U.S.
- October 2008, Separate Presentations to TAITRA branches in Tainan and Kaohsiung, Taiwan and Chang An, China. Topic: Protecting Patent Rights in the US and Limiting Foreign Manufacture Exposure in the U.S.
- March 2009, Separate Presentations to TAITRA branches in Taipei and Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Topic: What You Need to Know about the 2008 CPSIA and Strategies for Preventing Lawsuits for Companies Selling Goods to the U.S.
- June 2, 2009, Sponsor Hangzhou Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau (CIQ). Hangzhou, China. Topic: Sino-US Trade Related Laws and Regulations.
- November 10, 2009, Taipei Bar Association. Taipei, Taiwan. Topic: Representing Product Manufactures and Exporters: What every Taiwanese Attorney Needs to Know About US Law.
Awards and Honors
Other Sources of Feedback About Cathleen S. Huang
Included on the 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers list
Past Lists
- 2025 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2024 Northern California Super Lawyers list
- 2023 Northern California Super Lawyers list
Education
Legal Education
-
American University, Washington College of Law,
Washington,
District of Columbia
J.D.
Honors: magna cum laude
Non Legal Education
-
Walter A. Haas School of Business at University of California at Berkely,
Berkeley,
California
B.S., Bachelor of Science
Major: Corporate Finance and Marketing
Current Employment Position(s)
-
Partner
Languages
-
Mandarin Chinese
-
Taiwanese
Representative Clients
Venture (Singapore)
Chicony Power Technology Co., Ltd. (Taiwan)
Kwang Yang Motor Company (KYMCO) (Taiwan)
Taiwan Glass (Taiwan)
Representative Cases
-
Danby Prods. Inc. vs. New Widetech Indus. Co., Ltd., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 196376 (E.D. Penn Oct. 28, 2022) (Order Granting Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss.)
-
Englebrick vs. Worthington Industries, Inc., 944 F. Supp. 2d 899 (C.D. Cal. May 13, 2013) (Order Granting Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss)
-
Perez-Encinas vs. AmerUs Life Ins. Co., 468 F. Supp. 2d 1127 (N.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2006)(Order Granting Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment)
-
Shalaby vs. Irwin Indus., 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis 129812 (S.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2009)(Order Granting Motions To Exclude Experts)
Bar Admissions
- Virginia, 1998
- California, 2002
- U.S. District Court Northern District of California, 2005
- U.S. District Court Central District of California, 2008
- U.S. District Court Eastern District of California, 2008
- U.S. District Court Southern District of California, 2008
- U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit, 2006
- U.S. District Court Northern District of Illinois, 2015
Other Affiliations
- Defense Research Institute
- International Consumer Product Health & Safety Organization (ICPHSO)
- Asian American Bar Association
Photo
Videos
Contact
2121 North California Boulevard
Suite 875
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Phone Number: 925-478-5763
Email: Send a message
Disclaimer
Your Profile? Update Now
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.
How do I choose a lawyer?
Consider the following:
- Comfort Level – Are you comfortable telling the lawyer personal information? Does the lawyer seem interested in solving your problem?
- Credentials – How long has the lawyer been in practice? Has the lawyer worked on other cases similar to yours?
- Cost – How are the lawyer's fees structured — hourly or flat fee? Can the lawyer estimate the cost of your case?
- City – Is the lawyer's office conveniently located?
Not sure what questions to ask a lawyer?
Here are a few to get you started:
- How long have you been in practice?
- How many cases like mine have you handled?
- How often do you settle cases out of court?
- What are your fees and costs?
- What are the next steps?
Want to check lawyer discipline?
It is always a good idea to research your lawyer prior to hiring. Every state has a disciplinary organization that monitors attorneys, their licenses, and consumer complaints. By researching lawyer discipline you can:
- Ensure the attorney is currently licensed to practice in your state
- Gain an understanding of his or her historical disciplinary record, if any.
- Determine the seriousness of complaints/issues which could range from late bar fees to more serious issues requiring disciplinary action.