Anne Whalen Gill - Castle Rock, CO
Attorney at Anne Whalen Gill, L.L.C.
Appeals Lawyers in Castle Rock, CO
900 Castleton Road Suite 150 Castle Rock, CO 80109
- 1 Super Lawyers®
-
46
Years
Experience
Castle Rock Appeals Lawyer
Updated: 03/10/2026
Areas of Practice
- Appeals
Attorney Information
Awards and Honors
Honors
- 5280 Top Lawyer in Appeals 2015 - Present
- Super Lawyer, 2016 - Present
- Barrister’s Best/People Choice Appeals 2016
- Barrister’s Best Appeals, 2018-2019
Other Sources of Feedback About Anne Whalen Gill
Included on the 2026 Colorado Super Lawyers list
Past Lists
- 2025 Colorado Super Lawyers list
- 2024 Colorado Super Lawyers list
- 2023 Colorado Super Lawyers list
- 2022 Colorado Super Lawyers list
- 2021 Colorado Super Lawyers list
- 2020 Colorado Super Lawyers list
- 2019 Colorado Super Lawyers list
- 2018 Colorado Super Lawyers list
- 2017 Colorado Super Lawyers list
- 2016 Colorado Super Lawyers list
Education
-
Legal Education
-
New York Law School,
New York,
New York, 1979
J.D.
-
New York Law School,
New York,
New York, 1979
-
Non Legal Education
-
Dickinson College, 1969
B.S.
Honors: National Merit Scholar
Major: Geology -
City University of New York
Post-Graduate Study in Geology
-
Dickinson College, 1969
Past Positions
- Colorado Court of Appeals, Staff Attorney, 1988 - 2000
Representative Cases
-
Supreme Court of the State of Colorado
-
People v. Zadra, 2017 CO 18, affirming 10CA1207
-
In re Marriage of Gromicko, 387 P.3d 58 (Colo. 2017), 2017 CO 1
-
Glustrom v. Colorado Public Utilities Com’n, 280 P.3d 662 (Colo. 2012)
-
Regents of University of Colorado v. Students for Concealed Carry on Campus, LLC, 271 P.3d 496 (Colo. 2012)
-
Andersen v. Lindenbaum, 160 P.3d 237 (Colo. 2007)
-
State v. Denver, 139 P.3d 635 (Colo. 2006)
-
Smith v. Truman, 115 P.3d `179 (Colo. 2005)
-
Spahmer v. Gullette, 113 P.3d 158 (Colo. 2005)
-
In re Marriage of Ciesluk, 113 P.3d 135 (Colo. 2005), reversing 100 P.3d 527 (Colo. App. 2004)
-
In re Estate of DeWitt, 60 P.3d 746 (Colo. 2002)
-
Court of Appeals of the State of Colorado
-
Calvert v. Mayberry, 2016 COA 60, certiorari granted
-
In re Parental Responsibilities Concerning W.C., 2018 COA 63
-
In re Marriage of Vanderborgh, 370 P.3d 661 (Colo. App. 2016), 2016 COA 27
-
In re Parental Responsibilities Concerning B.C.B., 2015 COA 42
-
In re Marriage of Webb and Christiansen, 284 P.3d 107 (Colo. App. 2011)
-
In re Marriage of Connerton and Nevin, 260 P.3d 62 (Colo. App. 2010)
-
In re M.G. C.-G., 228 P.3d 271 (Colo. App. 2010)
-
In re Petition of J.A.V., 206 P.3d 467 (Colo. App. 2009)
-
State ex rel. Suthers v. Cash Advance and Preferred Cash Loans, 205 P.3d 389 (Colo. App. 2008)
-
Good v. Bear Canyon Ranch Ass’n, 160 P.3d 251 (Colo. App. 2007)
-
People v. Versteeg, 165 P.3d 760 (Colo. App. 2006)
-
Stauffer v. Stegman, 165 P.3d 713 (Colo. App. 2006)
-
Clinger v. Hartshorn, 89 P.3d 462 (Colo. App. 2003)
-
Equitex, Inc v. Unger, 60 P.3d 746 (Colo. App. 2002)
-
People ex rel. E.S., 49 P.3d 1221 (Colo. App. 2002)
-
People v. Rios, 43 P.3d 726 (Colo. App. 2002)
-
People v. Duke, 36 P.3d 149 (Colo. App. 2001)
-
Cases citing Colorado Appellate Law and Practice
-
Scott v. Scott, 136 P.3d 892 (Colo. 2006), affirming Estate of Scott, 119 P.3d 511 (Colo. App. 2004)
-
Romanoff v. State Com’n on Judicial Performance, 126 P.3d 182 (Colo. 2006)
-
People ex rel. Salazar v. Davidson, 79 P.3d 1221 (Colo. 2003)
-
Anstine v. Churchman, 74 P.3d 451 (Colo. App. 2003)
-
Marriage of Buck, 60 P.3d 788 (Colo. App. 2002)
Published Works
Articles
-
Colorado Appellate Law and Practice, Second edition, West’s Colorado Practice Series Volume 18
-
Colorado Appellate Law and Practice, Plank and Gill (West’s Colorado Practice Series Volume 18, 1999 and annual supplements) (Third Edition August 2018)
-
Post-Trial Motions, Robertson and Gill (Colorado Lawyer, Nov. 2003)
-
The Unwritten Rules of Appellate Practice, Trial Talk (April 2003)
-
Appealable Orders in Family Law, Rothenberg and Gill (Colorado Lawyer, Dec. 1997)
- Interpreting Colorado’s Governmental Immunity Act, (Colorado Lawyer, Nov. 1997)
- Motions Practice in the Court of Appeals, (Colorado Lawyer, Aug. 1994)
- Black’s Law Dictionary – Abridged Eighth Edition, Panel of Practicing Contributors
- Contributed to: Aids and the Law (Second Edition, 1992); Fitzgerald and Arena, Bankruptcy and Divorce: Support and Property Division (1992); Valiulis, Covenants Not to Compete: Forms, Tactics and the Law (1987-1992).
- Continuing Legal Education of Colorado: Colorado Appellate Practice
- State and Federal Appellate Practice 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2016, 2017
- Family Law Institute 2012, 204, 2015
- Appellate Case Study: Moreno v. Hall 2012
- Evaluating the Case for Appeal 2012
- Brief Writing 2003
- Oral Argument 2001
- Overview of Appellate Practice 1999, 1997
- Appellate Procedure 1998
- Family Law 1997
- Workers’ Compensation 1997
- Jurisdiction of the Appellate Courts 1996, 1995
- Motions Practice 1995
- Private Sponsors
- Overview of Appellate Practice 2003
- Jurisdiction of the Colorado Court of Appeals 1999
- Motions Practice in the Appellate Courts 1999
- Colorado’s Governmental Immunity Act 1996
- Computer Research (Judicial Conference) 1995
- In-house at the Colorado Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction of the Colorado Court of Appeals, 1995-2000; Colorado’s Governmental Immunity Act 1996.
Bar Admissions
- Colorado, 1985
- New York, 1980
- U.S. District Court Southern District of New York, 1981
- U.S. District Court District of Colorado, 2001
- U.S. Court of Appeals 10th Circuit, 2000
- U.S. Supreme Court, 2007
Other Affiliations
- Colorado Bar Association, Appellate Practice, 2000 - 2008 (Chairman, Vice Chairman)
- Colorado Supreme Court Committee on Appellate Rules, 1998 - Present
- Denver Bar Association
- Arapahoe Bar Association
- Douglas/Elbert Bar Association
Photo
Contact
Disclaimer
Your Profile? Update Now
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.