Skip to main content
Florek, Thomas E.

Thomas E. Florek - Chicago, IL

Attorney at Hirsch Law Group

Criminal Defense Lawyers in Chicago, IL

318 W Adams St Suite 1808 Chicago, IL 60606

Chicago Criminal Defense Lawyer

Updated: 11/02/2026

Areas of Practice

  • Criminal Defense

Attorney Information

Overview

Meet Thomas Florek, Criminal Defense Attorney at Hirsch Law Group. With nearly two decades of legal experience, Thomas has successfully represented thousands of clients in both Missouri and Illinois. His practice spans criminal matters ranging from traffic violations and misdemeanors to serious felony offenses, including murder.

Thomas is highly experienced in trial and motion practice and has built a strong record of obtaining Not Guilty verdicts, dismissals, and favorable outcomes for his clients. Known for his dedication and results-driven approach, Thomas is committed to pursuing the best possible outcome in every case he handles.


Education

Legal Education

  • University of Missouri - Kansas City School of Law, Kansas City, Missouri, 2007
    J.D.

Non Legal Education

  • Saint Louis University, 2004

Current Employment Position(s)

  • Criminal Defense Attorney

Languages

  • Polish

Bar Admissions

  • Illinois
  • Missouri
  • District of Columbia

Be the first to write a review!

There are currently no reviews for Thomas E. Florek. Be the first to share your experience.

Write a Review

Photo

Contact

Google Map

Chicago, IL

318 W Adams St
Suite 1808
Chicago, IL 60606

Directions

Phone Number: 630-360-9036

Email: Send a message

  • Credit Cards Accepted
  • Virtual Appointments

Contact Hirsch Law Group Today

Preferred contact method
DISCLAIMER: By submitting this form you accept the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer

Your Profile?  Update Now

When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.