Thomas J. Borkowski Jr. - Farmington Hills, MI
Attorney at Brown Borkowski & Morrow
Business Organizations Lawyers in Farmington Hills, MI
37887 W 12 Mile Road Farmington Hills, MI 48331
- Free Consultation
Farmington Hills Business Organizations Lawyer
Updated: 07/22/2026
Areas of Practice
- Business Organizations
- Trusts
- Wills
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Business & Commercial
- Contracts
- Divorce
- Estate Planning
- Family Law
- Landlord-Tenant
- Real Estate
- Mergers & Acquisitions
Attorney Information
Overview
Tom Borkowski is a shareholder at Brown Borkowski & Morrow. Tom was born and raised in Bay City, Michigan and has resided in Franklin, Michigan since moving to the Metro Detroit area after graduating from law school. He is married with four children and three grandchildren. He has been a coach for various little league and softball teams in the Franklin Little League, travel softball teams and also still enjoys playing hardball in the Detroit Men's Senior Baseball League. Tom also enjoys hunting and fishing in Lewiston and Alpena, as well as many other outdoor activities.
Education
Legal Education
-
Thomas M. Cooley Law School,
Lansing,
Michigan, 1996
J.D.
Non Legal Education
-
Central Michigan University,
Mt. Pleasant,
Michigan, 1990
B.S.B.A.
Major: Accounting
Current Employment Position(s)
-
Shareholder
Past Positions
- Borkowski Law PLLC
- The Arslanian Law Firm PC
- Schwartz Law Firm PC
- Chapp Law Firm PC
- Tax Tribunal Small Claims Hearing Officer
Bar Admissions
- Michigan, 1996
Specialties and Certifications
- Probate & Estate Planning Institute, ICLE
Other Affiliations
- Oakland County Bar Association
- State Bar of Michigan
- Phi Delta Phi International Law Fraternity
- Cooley Law School Alumni Association
Photo
Contact
Disclaimer
Your Profile? Update Now
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our FindLaw.com Legal Directory disclaimer. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.